Firstly it was an outside panel that opposed the FDA's approval of Zohydro
Yes, an outside panel appointed by the FDA as advisors, read this
FDA Panel Votes Against Recommending Zohydro for Approval - Partnership for Drug-Free Kids
Mainly on the basis of a lack of tamper resistance, with it's actual composition being a minor consideration
Zohydro doesn't contain acetaminophen like hydrocodone products so you can take high doses without risks like with paracetamol. When crushed up Zohydro's composition makes it as potent as heroin.
Secondly the amount of painkillers prescribed in the USA has nothing to do with the FDA and everything to do with money grubbing "Healthcare Providers".
Yes thats not in refute. But the FDA charges millions to big pharma for each new drug they want approving before the dodgy doctors and big pharma can make their money. Do you think the FDA didn't know what big pharma planned to do when the drug was released, and what the risks and likely consequences will be?
Is The FDA Being Compromised By Pharma Payments? - Forbes
Thirdly the links I posted are proving exactly the point that if Canada uses more Opiods than America then simple mathematics means that America cannot be using 80% - infact they cannot be using more than 49.9% (Otherwise the Canadians could not be using more than America)
The articles you've linked only go to 2010 first of all, and Zohydro didn't hit shelves until March this year. Your articles say Canada consumed the most hydromorphone, fentanyl and pethidine between 2006-2010.
Even throughout this period the painkillers which are commonly abused (oxycodone, morphine, methadone) were consumed more in the USA.
Reports of the US consuming 80% of the worlds painkillers and 99% of the worlds hydrocodone (the opiate in Vicodin and Zohydro) didn't start to appear until 2011/2 - the same time if not a little before they were also reporting a boom in heroin use, and this has continued to today. This info can be found from multiple sources i've already posted or told you where to find.
Finally I think you are missing the point of my post - I don't give a rat's ass about the FDA they're just another bunch of Big Pharma butt kissing bureaucrats looking to keep their jobs, my point is that your source is known to be inaccurate and biased
Known by who to be inaccurate and biased? Al Jazeera is also known as a fair, more accurate, and non-biased news source depending who you ask or where you look. And in comparison to existing US and UK news coverage? Or do you think they are reporting unbiased news? Personally i think all news is biased to a certain degree, some more then others and the truth is always somewhere between them all
Sent from my iPhone using Planet of the Vapes