What's new

Is The Smoke From E-cigarettes Considered Secondhand Smoke?

MOTI PLANET

Postman
Joined
Aug 25, 2022
Messages
161
(Reminder: Secondhand smoke is dangerous, especially for children. The best way to protect loved ones is to quit smoking.)


The smoke from electronic cigarettes is not considered secondhand smoke?

First look at the definition of secondhand smoke: secondhand smoke, also known as passive smoking and environmental tobacco smoke, is a mixture of smoke released from the burning end of cigarettes or other Tobacco.



Simplify the point: tobacco smoke

So it is clear that e-cigarettes are not secondhand smoke. Because the ingredients of e-cigarettes are nicotine, propylene glycol, glycerin, and flavoring, they do not contain tobacco. (Incidentally, nicotine is prevalent in the Solanaceae family, not unique to tobacco.)



So, the mist exhaled by the e-cigarette and cigarette smoke mist is more harmful?

For the e-cigarette "secondhand smoke" problem, the CDC has taken a study of the composition of the urine of e-cigarette users, a total of two scientific research.



The first was in 2014, CDC researchers released a research paper on VOCs (volatile organic compounds) in the smoke of traditional tobacco and e-cigarettes, showing that the VOCs metabolite VOCMs content in the urine of e-cigarette users is similar to that of people who never smoked, while the concentration of VOCs in smokers is significantly higher than that of e-cigarette users, smokeless tobacco users and people who never smoked.



PS: VOCMs are the metabolites produced by the body's processing of VOCs, which are excreted through urine.VOCs (volatile organic compounds) are a collective term for organic compounds that are volatile under certain conditions, and harmful substances such as benzene, toluene, and formaldehyde, which we often hear about, are all in VOCs.



v2-e6e5b5ac799004d8338efbeb48390436_r.jpg

The second is July 2020, research results show that the content of tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNA) metabolite NNAL in the urine of e-cigarette users is extremely low, only 2.2% of cigarette users, is 0.6% of smokeless tobacco (snuff, chewing tobacco, etc.) users.



v2-a4f31e772e032450ee40bb2c06e9c59d_r.jpg

More than 70 carcinogens have been identified in conventional tobacco and secondhand smoke, of which tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNA) are the most important carcinogens in tobacco and the smoke produced by its combustion, and are extremely harmful to the health of smokers and secondhand smokers.



TSNA contains NNK, NNN, NAB, NAT and so on. Among them, NNK and NNN have been identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as the major contributors to the carcinogenicity of cigarette smoke.



NNAL is a metabolite produced by the body's processing of nitrosamines (TSNAs) and is excreted through the urine. People inhale nitrosamines (TSNAs) through the use of tobacco products or secondhand smoke, and then the metabolite NNAL is excreted in the urine.



The results of the study showed that the average urinary NNAL concentration was 993.3 ng/g creatinine for smokeless tobacco users, 285.4 ng/g creatinine for cigarette users, and 6.3 ng/g creatinine for users of e-cigarette products, which means that the amount of the tobacco-specific nitrosamine metabolite NNAL in the urine of e-cigarette users was only 2.2% of that of cigarette users and 0.6% of that of smokeless tobacco users.



v2-6b826827533f7298321e02225ccdcfbd_r.jpg

Therefore, these two most harmful volatiles are not present, at least not in the same large and significant quantities as in cigarettes, or e-cigarettes.


In summary, both conceptually and compositionally, the smoke from the e-cigarette period is "secondhand smoke" in the traditional sense. However, because e-cigarettes are relatively new, there is no way to have a large number of conclusions and data references in a short period, and there is no way to quote the exact and complete conclusion, so we should look forward to more scientific research results. Look at it rationally.
 
I think someone is confusing burning as in tobacco with atomisation by boiling as in e cigs.
Burning produces smoke hence the term smoking.
Boiling produces vapour hence the term vaping.
 
im wondering why the fook this even a question & probably why ive never bought anything from Moti & never will....
 
No, it's not and just in case any random souls are reading this.....

There is no danger from second-hand vapour from a 'normal' PG/VG/Flavouring/Nicotine e-cig.

Public Health England are clear that passive vaping, i.e. someone breathing in vapour from someone else’s vape is completely harmless.

That was even backed up California Public Health who tested the air in vape shops (the places that have the most second hand vapour wafting around in them) and there was nothing in the air in any amount that would do harm to anyone. (excluding some kind of unique allergy)

The Research has been done and we know the answer, there's no reason (especially vape companies!!) to muddy the waters with confusing articles like this. No wonder so many people still believe that vaping might be a bit dodgy.
 
@MOTI PLANET

Why don't you write in your native language or just post the links to the research?
Most of what you've written is nonsensical garbage.
:(
 
I`d like to see the results if they analyzed the air in any town centre, or maybe I wouldn`t, but I`m sure as hell not going to worry about "as yet unidentified health risks".
 
Back
Top Bottom