What's new

Why have more than one mod?

But his grammar was correct, you can phrase it either way, so naye, marking this one down as a fail :)

Oh FFS @ nitpickers anonymous biOforger.
Am I forbidden to correct a logical error in his post because, as you point out, his nonesensical statement was grammatically correct nonense? :18: I don't see how anyone can name a law (or anything else) after some other law which, as yet lacks a name? Do you? Therefore I figure he meant pretty much the opposite of what he said.

The law should be called Numpty 's Law, IMO, because Numpty was the one to propose the law. And if he happens to demonstrate what a Numpty he is, in the process, well that's really neat, IMO.
 
Oh FFS @ nitpickers anonymous biOforger.
verbal diarrhoea clipped...

hah pedant! I would respond in kind, but Mitz said I had to shutup and not post in this public thread anymore, so i'll just stfu now :D
 
All joking aside, I really like the fact that it is extremely rare for anyone to correct someone's grammar or spelling on here. We're here to help people give up smoking, ultimately, and as long as we can make out what someone is saying, that's what really matters. No point in risking alienating people over some words and commas.
 
All joking aside ... as long as we can make out what someone is saying, that's what really matters.
Quite! This place has no time for the Grammar Nazis but deliberately setting out to post unintelligibly is of no benefit.
 
Back
Top Bottom