My attempt - went without reply - Peter Lilley MP for Harpenden...
Thank you for your reply dated 12/02/2015 to my enquiry regarding your views on the TPD.
I appreciate your efforts in gaining a reply from Peter Hunt (RefO00000915117), which is pretty much as expected given his response the impending legal challenge, however I feel you may have missed the point of my initial enquiry.
In the forthcoming general election I, along with all of your constituents, am faced with a choice of who best represents my views.
Given the recent electorate malaise and reported distrust of their representatives, I have attempted to establish this with enquires regarding specific matters which are topical and important to me at present. Mr Hunt does not appear on my ballot paper, where as you do.
What I was after was your opinion on the TPD, and specifically on the forthcoming legal challenge of which a copy of the 'Statement of Facts and Grounds' is attached to this email.
In my view it makes compelling arguments against Article 20 of the directive, and should be supported although I am open to reasons and debate as to why it should not?
Whilst on the face of it a fairly narrow topic I think there are far reaching implications into the way in which we are governed, along with the pandering to the giant pharmaceutical and tobacco industries and the encouragement of enterprise for the small business.
I am not looking for a 'party political broadcast', but an insight into one of my electoral candidates views?
Thanks and regards
Thank you for your reply dated 12/02/2015 to my enquiry regarding your views on the TPD.
I appreciate your efforts in gaining a reply from Peter Hunt (RefO00000915117), which is pretty much as expected given his response the impending legal challenge, however I feel you may have missed the point of my initial enquiry.
In the forthcoming general election I, along with all of your constituents, am faced with a choice of who best represents my views.
Given the recent electorate malaise and reported distrust of their representatives, I have attempted to establish this with enquires regarding specific matters which are topical and important to me at present. Mr Hunt does not appear on my ballot paper, where as you do.
What I was after was your opinion on the TPD, and specifically on the forthcoming legal challenge of which a copy of the 'Statement of Facts and Grounds' is attached to this email.
In my view it makes compelling arguments against Article 20 of the directive, and should be supported although I am open to reasons and debate as to why it should not?
Whilst on the face of it a fairly narrow topic I think there are far reaching implications into the way in which we are governed, along with the pandering to the giant pharmaceutical and tobacco industries and the encouragement of enterprise for the small business.
I am not looking for a 'party political broadcast', but an insight into one of my electoral candidates views?
Thanks and regards