Perfectly illustrated by the ......... (insert words of choice) at the Stanton Glantz stable publishing a (yet another) half-baked preliminary study (actually a talk given at the American Association for Cancer Research annual meeting - emotive associations forming already?) picked up on
here This is already starting to do the rounds in the shock schlock media.
Meanwhile we have a perfectly sensible letter to the editor of an NJ paper
here making a rational and well-argued point. Who is it written by? This chap, "Gilbert Ross, medical and executive director, American Council on Science and Health" want to read some more of their articles? Here, try
these .
As a dedicated vaper you probably do have a bias to the latter organisation, but if you are Joe Public, the average daily mail reader, then the journalists you read won't want to you read any of this: it's boring, there are no explosions, poisonings, shock, awe, death or destruction ... or what Hitler said ...