and they forget the issue that a child who vapes is almost certainly a child who already smokes, or would've smoked if they hadn't tried vaping instead.
They use the increasing numbers who've tried it as a terrible omen for kids' health - the fact is that, as vaping becomes more common, of course there will be an increase in the small number of kids who will try it. The real question is whether those kids would've tried smoking instead if ecigs hadn't been there instead.
Though no-one wants to encourage any unnecessary dependence on anything at any age, one thing that's indisputable is that, if a rebellious child is going to become dependent on nicotine, it's exponentially better for it to be through the use of ecigs rather than tobacco.