What's new

Best mods right now???

I'm not arguing I'm just telling you the facts 67w on a dna mod is 67w on a smok most likely not. smok bring out about 10 devices every year whilst dna chips are put in maybe 4 or 5 mods per year, smok have quality control issues but mainly on their coils
 
well think of it this way. French cars are ok but generally crap and less reliable when compared to German and Japanese cars and if you look at the sport cars you'll find the gear ratios, fuel delivery and efficiency si far superior to the french ones. The same could be said for smok vs dna

If by "french cars" you mean Renault - fine ;)

But I have to say, I've personally had more failures (that were far more expensive to contemplate fixing) from German (vw, BMW, mercedes) and Japanese (mitsubishi and Toyota) cars than from PSA group (Citroen/Peugeot) examples.
 
I'm not arguing I'm just telling you the facts 67w on a dna mod is 67w on a smok most likely not. smok bring out about 10 devices every year whilst dna chips are put in maybe 4 or 5 mods per year, smok have quality control issues but mainly on their coils

I'm not arguing either.

I'm not 'defending' smok or trying to 'defame' DNA.

Personally, if I was given the choice of the two brands I'd likely be happier to pay £70 for a DNA based unit than to pay £35 for and smok. Actually, I'd probably not buy a smok no matter how cheap it was - because I think most of them look pants.

I'm only curious as to why you feel it's important that the display is accurate.
 
I'll be honest, I'm very unlikely to read that link - nothing personal, just can't be bothered ;)

I've never tried a smok device, nor a DNA so I'm not (and wasn't) challenging whether one was better or not.

One thing I will say though, with the various chipsets I have I've never thought "this could be more accurate". I honestly don't care if it's outputting the displayed wattage, because I don't really look at it much anyway and I've never measured it (people who say "it feels like a 90W vape" or similar are butt talking imo) - and with TC, I don't care if it's within X degrees of the displayed temperature just so long as it stays close enough to where I set it.
I have a few smok and a few DNA mods up to the new species 2 smok pre release (works fine) and the DNA 250c there's no contest fs [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
 
I have a few smok and a few DNA mods up to the new species 2 smok pre release (works fine) and the DNA 250c there's no contest fs [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]

So you prefer the smok then? ;)
 
And how is this discussion possibly going against me?

I'm asking for a personal perspective as to why this particular thing is of value to one person, there is no right or wrong answer (even if he's confusing the terms "accuracy" and "consistency", which often happens) and there is no argument.

On the whole, if I can't be bothered to carry on an argument it's because I'd get a more intelligent response from a goldfish.

My my you're touchy.
"Argument" your words, not mine, I said discussion.
Are you suggesting that myself, and the guys in this thread are less intelligent than a goldfish ? that's not very nice..........
 
I'm not arguing either.

I'm not 'defending' smok or trying to 'defame' DNA.

Personally, if I was given the choice of the two brands I'd likely be happier to pay £70 for a DNA based unit than to pay £35 for and smok. Actually, I'd probably not buy a smok no matter how cheap it was - because I think most of them look pants.

I'm only curious as to why you feel it's important that the display is accurate.

not the display but the actual vape. if i want 60w then I want 60w not 59 but then again I mainly use TC I highly doubt the smok is anywhere near accurate.
 
Not the guys in this thread (so far)......

That can only lead me to the conclusion that you are implying that I am less intelligent than a goldfish.
And possibly guys in other threads you have participated in.
 
Back
Top Bottom