Unfortunately not so....
From
https://coronavirusexplained.ukri.org/en/article/cad0002/
"The new coronavirus appears to have a fatality rate closer to the worldwide pandemic flu in 1918 that killed an estimated 1.0–1.5% of those infected, after accounting for milder undetected cases. Unusually, the 1918 virus caused a higher proportion of deaths among young adults. The 2009 ‘swine flu’ pandemic had a relatively low overall death rate of 0.01–0.08%, which is why strict control measures were not considered at that time.
The majority (around 80%) of people who become infected with the new coronavirus will only suffer from minor illness. But the fatality rate following infection is still high compared to other pandemic diseases, adding up to a large number of potential deaths across the world. More precise estimates of fatality rate in different age groups, and those with underlying health conditions, are critical to planning protection for those most vulnerable.!"
No offence but if you are going to publish something that starts with:
"Current research suggests that the new coronavirus has a fatality rate among infected people that is 6–16 times higher than common flu."
BUT then says:
"However, this figure may change as we make more accurate measurements of the number of people who have been infected with the new coronavirus and the number that have died with COVID-19."
and it dated 25th March 2020 just as we went in lockdown
I'd say the data the report used is a little out of date
as I said somewhere else on this forum
the UK suffered far worse with Influenza & Pneumonia deaths prior to a vaccine programme of 14m pa in UK
the BBC quickly pulled a chart they first used, when saying 3 times more deadly than flu in the last 20 years
Alas the original chart the BBC used displayed a HIGHER rate of deaths from 1992 to 2000
for 8 years there was 60,000 deaths pa - which on a smaller population back then equates to 70,000 today
Also there was 63,000 deaths pa in a period 1975 to 1983 - another 8 year period
it was only after 2000 was a national flu vaccine programme introduced
and comparing todays COVID-19 (no vaccine) against influenza with the vaccine programme for last 20 years
is a little like comparing apples & oranges
of course the BBC pulled the original graph
and nobody talks of the great severe lockdowns 1975~1983 & 1992~2000 where more deaths occured
oh right there wasn't one, nor does anybody remember wearing masks back then
the original BBC graph...
quickly replaced by this 2020 only graph...
BBC replacement proven by google search...
So going back to ONS data to show mortality spike in 1992~2000
and in 1975~1983
and if you want Spanish Flu figure
the point of all this, the flu is quite bad - WITHOUT A VACCINE
and there was instances where there was quite high periods of motality
yet there was no widespread panic, hysteria & lockdowns with masks that I can remember at those periods
so data & reports can be skewed/presented in different ways to suit the narrative being pushed
(including my own post here)