What's new

More Sensationalist Crap

webzcas

Postman
Joined
Nov 16, 2014
Messages
100
This time on the Sky News Website. However, it does say deep in the article that the toxins it refers to are only 1% of what is found in tobacco smoke and general pollution:

E-Cigarettes Are Harmful To Lungs - Study

E-cigarettes contain toxic chemicals which could damage the lungs and immune system, scientists have discovered.

Experiments carried out on mice found e-cigarette fumes harmed the animals' lungs and made them more susceptible to respiratory infections.

Chemicals generated by the nicotine devices also weakened the immune system's response to viruses and bacteria, causing some mice to die.

Researchers found e-cigarette vapour contains "free radical" toxins similar to those found in air pollution and cigarette smoke.

Although the study said they generated just 1% of the amount of free radicals in tobacco smoke, these molecules can damage DNA and cell membranes.

The study was carried out by scientists at John Hopkins University in Baltimore.

Professor Shyam Biswai said: "Our findings suggest that e-cigarettes are not neutral in terms of the effects on the lungs.
An e-cigarette sits in a tray on the bar at the Henley Vaporium in New York City

E-cigarette sales could overtake cigarette sales in the US within 10 years

"We have observed that they increase the susceptibility to respiratory infections in the mouse models.

"This warrants further study in susceptible individuals, such as COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder) patients who have switched from cigarettes to e-cigarettes, or to new users of e-cigarettes who may have never used cigarettes."

The study exposed mice to e-cigarette vapour equivalent to doses inhaled by humans for a period of two weeks.

Researchers then infected the mice with pneumonia bacteria or the flu virus.

The results showed the infected mice were far more likely to develop a weakened immune system.

Co-author of the report Dr Thomas Sussan said: "E-cigarette vapour alone produced mild effects on the lungs, including inflammation and protein damage.

"However, when this exposure was followed by a bacterial or viral infection, the harmful effects of e-cigarette exposure became even more pronounced.

"The e-cigarette exposure inhibited the ability of mice to clear the bacteria from their lungs, and the viral infection led to increased weight loss and death, indicative of an impaired immune response."

Results of the study have been published in the online journal Public Library of Science ONE.
 
Last edited:
How did they study the smoking habits of the mice before hand?

Perhaps some of them were on higher nic juices and were dripping?

Perhaps they were run down at work already and were feeling a bit peaky already?

Perhaps mice are infinitesimally smaller than the target audience?

Perhaps I'm paying rather too much attention to the mice since as you rightly state this appears to be sensationalist bollocks dressed up as news :D
 
What a marvellous piece of utter garbage yet again from bedroom scientists paid for by big tobacco.

I'd line them all up against the wall :guns: :lol1:
 
& down in the lab.....


Mouse No1 - "Alright, what are you in for then ?"

Mouse No2 - "Oh, err, eliquid experrymunts"

Mouse No1 - "What's that then ?"

Mouse No2 - "Well, basically they're gonna make me inhale some eliquid"

Mouse No1 - "Ah cool, sounds alright that"

Mouse No2 - "Yeah except they're gonna give me a human size dose, dunno what's so 'alright' about that"

Mouse No1 - "You're fucked mate"

Mouse No2 - "Yeah.....& you're fuckin' next"

Mouse No3 - "Alright, what are you in for then"

Tbc....
 
What a marvellous piece of utter garbage yet again from bedroom scientists paid for by big tobacco.

I'd line them all up against the wall :guns: :lol1:

The thing is, your average Daily Mail type reader will buy this crap as fact.
 
The thing is, your average Daily Mail type reader will buy this crap as fact.

Upon reading pretty much most of the comments you would be right but there are a few that really pour scorn onto the article and other idiotic commentators!


Sent from my iPhone using Planet of the Vapes
 
I read the daily mail.

I have a grudging fondness for Littlejohn.

I still think this is bollocks.

Do the first 2 negate the 3rd? :)
 
I don't understand why this is being labelled as sensationalist crap. It seems to be evidence-based information.
 
Back
Top Bottom