Vapemonkey1980 Achiever Joined Mar 13, 2013 Messages 1,962 Feb 5, 2015 #11 oldhippydude said: yes Click to expand... Yikes... It must be true then!! Off to start an ecig burning rally, back shortly
oldhippydude said: yes Click to expand... Yikes... It must be true then!! Off to start an ecig burning rally, back shortly
vincey Postman Joined Apr 3, 2014 Messages 818 Feb 5, 2015 #12 Vapemonkey1980 said: Yikes... It must be true then!! Off to start an ecig burning rally, back shortly Click to expand... Give me all your shiniessssssssssssssssssssss
Vapemonkey1980 said: Yikes... It must be true then!! Off to start an ecig burning rally, back shortly Click to expand... Give me all your shiniessssssssssssssssssssss
Diablo Achiever Joined Oct 14, 2013 Messages 1,784 Feb 5, 2015 #13 DaveX said: Daily Mail down to just 2,376,253 potential causes of cancer Click to expand... Brilliant
DaveX said: Daily Mail down to just 2,376,253 potential causes of cancer Click to expand... Brilliant
darkprincelucifer Postman Joined Nov 14, 2013 Messages 348 Feb 5, 2015 #14 SimonB2008 said: I don't understand why this is being labelled as sensationalist crap. It seems to be evidence-based information. Click to expand... The experiment establishes the facts, the media interpret them. The sensationalist crap is on the part of the journalist who wrote the article - it's clearly been written to be dramatic when in reality, nothing new has come out of the experiment. "No News" doesn't sell papers. Death does.
SimonB2008 said: I don't understand why this is being labelled as sensationalist crap. It seems to be evidence-based information. Click to expand... The experiment establishes the facts, the media interpret them. The sensationalist crap is on the part of the journalist who wrote the article - it's clearly been written to be dramatic when in reality, nothing new has come out of the experiment. "No News" doesn't sell papers. Death does.