What's new

Royal College of Physicians Report on ecigs

dansus

Achiever
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
1,601
Its good news folks. "Promote ecigs widely as a substitute for smoking"

https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/nicotine-without-smoke-tobacco-harm-reduction-0
http://www.gponline.com/gps-advised...h-promotion/smoking-cessation/article/1393012
https://pharmacyinpractice.org/2016...ttes-widely-says-royal-college-of-physicians/
http://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i1745

Key recommendations
  • Smoking is the biggest avoidable cause of death and disability, and social inequality in health, in the UK.
  • Most of the harm to society and to individuals caused by smoking in the near-term future will occur in people who are smoking today.
  • Vigorous pursuit of conventional tobacco control policies encourages more smokers to quit smoking.
  • Quitting smoking is very difficult and most adults who smoke today will continue to smoke for many years.
  • People smoke because they are addicted to nicotine, but are harmed by other constituents of tobacco smoke.
  • Provision of the nicotine that smokers are addicted to without the harmful components of tobacco smoke can prevent most of the harm from smoking.
  • Until recently, nicotine products have been marketed as medicines to help people to quit.
  • NRT is most effective in helping people to stop smoking when used together with health professional input and support, but much less so when used on its own.
  • E-cigarettes are marketed as consumer products and are proving much more popular than NRT as a substitute and competitor for tobacco cigarettes.
  • E-cigarettes appear to be effective when used by smokers as an aid to quitting smoking.
  • E-cigarettes are not currently made to medicines standards and are probably more hazardous than NRT.
  • However, the hazard to health arising from long-term vapour inhalation from the e-cigarettes available today is unlikely to exceed 5% of the harm from smoking tobacco.
  • Technological developments and improved production standards could reduce the long-term hazard of e-cigarettes.
  • There are concerns that e-cigarettes will increase tobacco smoking by renormalising the act of smoking, acting as a gateway to smoking in young people, and being used for temporary, not permanent, abstinence from smoking.
  • To date, there is no evidence that any of these processes is occurring to any significant degree in the UK.
  • Rather, the available evidence to date indicates that e-cigarettes are being used almost exclusively as safer alternatives to smoked tobacco, by confirmed smokers who are trying to reduce harm to themselves or others from smoking, or to quit smoking completely.
  • There is a need for regulation to reduce direct and indirect adverse effects of e-cigarette use, but this regulation should not be allowed significantly to inhibit the development and use of harm-reduction products by smokers.
  • A regulatory strategy should, therefore, take a balanced approach in seeking to ensure product safety, enable and encourage smokers to use the product instead of tobacco, and detect and prevent effects that counter the overall goals of tobacco control policy.
  • The tobacco industry has become involved in the e-cigarette market and can be expected to try to exploit these products to market tobacco cigarettes, and to undermine wider tobacco control work.
  • However, in the interests of public health it is important to promote the use of e-cigarettes, NRT and other non-tobacco nicotine products as widely as possible as a substitute for smoking in the UK.
 
Last edited:
RCP's view on the TPD.

RCP_TPD.jpg
 
Even some of the traditionally anti ecig papers are positive on the report.

Commenting on the report, Cancer Research UK’s director of prevention Alison Cox said: “We believe e-cigarettes have real promise in helping to reduce the huge death toll from tobacco in the UK"

Duncan Selbie, chief executive at Public Health England, added: “The evidence is clear; vaping is much less harmful to health than smoking, and this report further highlights the important role of e-cigarettes in reducing the deadly harms smoking causes.

Dr Mike Knapton, Associate Medical Director at the British Heart Foundation, said there were some nine million adults in the UK who still smoke, despite 70 per cent wanting to quit. He added: 'E-cigarettes are new devices commonly used by smokers that deliver nicotine without tobacco, and are an effective way of reducing the harm caused.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-new...s-seal-approval-7849838#ICID=sharebar_twitter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...tml?login#readerCommentsCommand-message-field
 
It's about time they saw sense instead of all the crap the anti ecig (big pharma) brigade have been spouting over the years. I think we are lucky (& thanks to all the vapers that have worked hard for this) that it's going this way when compared to other countries. We just need to squash the European crap now that I'm sure will try & overrule this stance.
 
You know what? I think I will too. Lord knows, I wrote enough letters when the legislation was being drafted
 
You know what? I think I will too. Lord knows, I wrote enough letters when the legislation was being drafted

Me too and he was totally unreceptive.
Would you mind filming yourself twatting said politician please? It's raining and I feel this would cheer me up no end [emoji4]
 
Me too and he was totally unreceptive.
Would you mind filming yourself twatting said politician please? It's raining and I feel this would cheer me up no end [emoji4]
I would love to but
  1. It was a verbal twatting I was refering to, does anyone really want to watch a fat bloke type a letter?
  2. I doubt it would help things
  3. I don't like prison food/big Jeff from D wing
  4. last time I checked it was still kind of frowned upon to hit women
You know what? I think I will too. Lord knows, I wrote enough letters when the legislation was being drafted
Do it, can't do any more harm. I just went down the this is what I object to, why are you still doing this when the RCP and PHE have said what they said path.
 
I would love to but
  1. It was a verbal twatting I was refering to, does anyone really want to watch a fat bloke type a letter?
  2. I doubt it would help things
  3. I don't like prison food/big Jeff from D wing
  4. last time I checked it was still kind of frowned upon to hit women

[emoji23]

1: Yes. That's far more interesting than my morning thus far.
2: It would make yin and yang re align and give good karma to the rest of your week
3: Prison food is better the most takeaways. Jeff is just misunderstood.
4: I agree and have no smart arse response to this.

[emoji6]
 
Back
Top Bottom