what's going to be if they see me vaping in a car with a child? How much does it cost?
Vaping in cars containing kids isn't against the law, but imo you should be respectful of passengers in a car when vaping regardless. Other considerations are that vapour can affect visibility if it builds up in a confined space and build up on your windows is a pita. Also be careful when driving on bumpy roads...potholes + driptip = possible dental bills lol
The issue of passive vaping isn't really an issue...well in my opinion it isn't even if I personally choose not to vape in confined spaces if nonsmokers, kids or pets are about.
Sorry - I'm turning into a bloggy-bore lmao - but I wrote a piece recently about passive vaping in a vape mythbusting blog. Apologies for ny busted links n' pics - this hasn't been published yet.
Just coz its not as harmful as passive smoking doesn't mean it's completely harmless, I pretty much think its about as harmful as breathing ambient air outside in a city but that's just my opinion - I'm not wearing the white coat
Passive vaping is as harmful as passive smoking
For me the amount of cloud I produce while vaping is an annoyance, sadly I enjoy a good airy, but warm, direct lung hit using smooth sweet high VG juice at a moderately high wattage – when I vape indoors I feel as if I should equip the cats with hazard lights, and issue low visibility warnings. I am more conscious of my vaping ‘emissions’ indoors in a way I never was when I smoked tobacco. Even though I know it’s dumb, I’m constantly worried that people might think that I am somehow poisoning them with my ‘obnoxious’ second-hand vape.
The anti-vaping ‘experts’ and the media, have been quick to trumpet the potential dangers of inhaling second-hand vapour. The World Health Organisation (WHO) even went so far to suggest that the use of all electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) indoors should be banned by law, due to concerns that they could be as toxic to bystanders as cigarettes.
Trouble is, when you’re vaping the cloud produced is way more visible than cigarette smoke, it also smells a whole lot better than ciggies which makes it more noticeable to other people and ironically leads to a lot more hate from those so inclined to complain about their right to breathe ‘fresh air’. This usually comes from people standing in at a bus stop, at the side of a busy road when you’ve made a conscious decision to vape 20 feet upwind of them so as not to pollute their carbon monoxide filled ‘fresh air’ with the scent of sweet apple doughnuts while you wait for the bus to arrive.
Vapour is more visible than ciggie smoke, and therefore more annoying to some people. Does this mean that it is actually harmful in any meaningful way though?
Well to all the haters out there I would say that just coz you can see it doesn’t mean that it is worse.
The chemical structure of vapour produced by e-cigarettes is very simple in comparison to smoke from cigarettes. Comprised primarily of larger molecules, vapour is easily seen, and avoided. Conversely, 80% of cigarette smoke is invisible to the naked eye and lingers longer. Seeing as cigarette smoke contains over 4,500 chemicals, many of which are irritants or toxins, of which 50+ are known to cause cancer, I’d say that cigarette smoke is far more sinister and threatening. Gimme something I can see, and waft away with a magazine, than something that is invisible and going to hang about in the room unseen for ages.
So YAY...at least you can run away from second hand vapour, but that isn’t always a practical way to avoid the danger...hang on, what ARE the dangers of second-hand vapour anyway?
Well, to be honest there doesn’t appear to be much danger attached to passive vaping that isn’t associated with lazy reporting and biased scientific studies. The general medical consensus is that there is little or no harm presented to others from second hand vapour at all.
“Current state of knowledge about the chemistry of liquids and aerosols associated with electronic cigarettes indicates that there is no evidence that vaping produces inhalable exposures to
contaminants of the aerosol that would warrant health concerns.”
(BMC, Jan 2014)
“There is a large body of evidence suggesting that e-cigarettes are relatively harmless to the people who use them, making claims about the dangers of second-hand exposure even more spurious — especially in well-ventilated outdoor spaces where people can easily move away from someone using the product.”
(Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Dec 2013)
When compared to second hand cigarette smoke, second hand vape is so inoffensive it is difficult to figure out why passive vaping should even be considered an issue. A dog fart is probably more toxic, and certainly smells worse.
The only ‘harmful’ element shared by cigarette smoke and e-cigarette vapour is the nicotine. Nicotine levels are very much lower in vape aerosol, and the actual level of threat to health presented by nicotine is very much subject to debate. Tobacco and e-juice are not the only consumables that contain nicotine – some very common foodstuffs do too, aubergines and potatoes for example, albeit in lower levels. It might also come as a surprise to learn that nicotine is believed to be helpful in the treatment of numerous medical conditions, including Alzheimer’s Disease and Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD). Nicotine is the most recognizable ingredient of tobacco, regardless of the thousands of other chemicals found in cigarettes, and therefore it has become unfairly maligned, and incorrectly associated with smoking related illnesses.
In conclusion, passive vaping as a danger to others is just another example of the general trend of demonising of vaping. Still, that is not an excuse to chuff out clouds in other folk’s air space and expect them to like it. Be considerate to others, my fellow vapers - we get enough bad press as it is.