The Daily Mail are having a pop at the 95% risk reduction too

[Gonloopy]

Sigh and so it begins..

See previous post re lancet and PHE. And shock /horror the daily mail are at it too

E-cigarette industry funded experts who ruled that vaping is safe | Daily Mail Online

 

[knome]

Reading the comments, why do some successful cold turkeyers come across as smug wankers?

 

[Mark]

Reading the comments, why do some successful cold turkeyers come across as smug wankers?

Because having endured the agony of withdrawal they're incensed that we have found a way of enjoying nicotine with a fraction of the risk of smoking?

Or maybe because they are just smug wankers?

 

[eyeball]

So how many people are seriously ill or died from vaping?

 

[kermitthefog]

What the Daily Mail always fail to consider is that reading their sad excuse for a newspaper will reinforce / turn you into an angry small minded bigot who is so incensed at everything you will likely die of a stroke. That's the real health story

 

[TuX93]

The article must be right, I died from Vaping.

 

[connor]

The only time I read Daily Mail articles is to laugh at the poor sods in the comment section who takes it as serious news and an official source, it's gutter news and is expected to try and sway the public one way or another. Let's see them, or any publication Murdoch owns for that matter, conduct scientific studies to disprove these facts Then I'll listen

 

[scrumpox]

It's a ridiculous backlash. A minority of authors, 3 out of 11, with links to pharmaceutical companies, in just one of the research reports considered somehow undermines the veracity of the entire PHE report?
Dame Sally's objection once more tries to move the argument from "safer" to "safe", because the safer debate is already lost.

Keep them coming, Daily Fail. The more debate the better as far as I'm concerned.

Here's a beaut of an emotional and evidence-lacking response from a Daily Fail reader ... "There is no reason why these things shouldn't be regulated in the same way as ordinary cigarettes. There must be a risk to passive smokers, however small."

 

[arewethereyet]

I'm now convinced if you sucked your thumb in public they'd compare it to cigarette smoking and ban it, because someone would say there's tiny risk however small of passive thumb sucking LMAO.


They keep going on without any evidence to back up their BS that vaping is bad for the user or those around them,I believe these people should stay cocooned in their houses and never venture out because lets face it every time you leave the confines of the house your health it at risk the air you breath is not without risk,heck more people have died falling down stairs than vaping and yet there's no call for tighter restrictions on stairs ffs Daily Mail get out of my face and tackle the real killer CIGARETTES.

 

[the drill]

keep it simple...

is vaping good for you? ... no!
is it way better than smoking tobacco? ... yes!

all the scaremongering about e-cigs... was the research mainly funded by the tobacco companies? ... who knows?
but the government have accepted the reasearch saying its 95% better than smoking as it came from a reputable source.
it doesnt matter who funded it..

i was a smoker for 36-odd years, i feel better, i can breathe easier, i dont get out of breath as quickly.
ive been cigarette free for 5 months, the long term effects? who knows! but all i know is in myself i feel 95% better.