What's new

The Daily Mail are having a pop at the 95% risk reduction too

aye - thats me :)

If I am gonna end up feeling like crap the next morning I would like to remember that it tasted nice.....

and emptied ya wallet ;)

fair do's though tramps piss cider is nasty tasting and 30quid vodka is..............
 
and emptied ya wallet ;)

fair do's though tramps piss cider is nasty tasting and 30quid vodka is..............

lol - my wallet gets emptied anyway if I have a proper night on the Vodka, but thats by the wife ;)
 
Well, It just proves what I thought all along! nothing is SAFE!! Every bit of research into safety, from microwaves to motor cars is funded, to some degree by the applicable industries.
It's a confusing world! Even the articles in the Daily Mail, are "funded" by the Daily Mail itself and it would not surprise me to find that the article itself was funded by the tobacco industry :D. I no longer believe that oranges are orange because there's a possible conflict of interest between the Fruit Industry and the Spectrum.
Anyway, I was vaping long before the Daily Mail got their sensationalist mitts onto it and I'll still be vaping long after the Daily Mail has moved on to their next "scary thing" to terrify their readers with.
 
Last edited:
It's maddening
The only argument for criticizing Public Health England Report on e-cigarettes? Citing conflict of interest in 1 of the 185 cited studies, (2 members of the panel belonged to the ecig industry). If that particular study was taken out, it would be more like 99% safer.... Go figure.
:(
 
Last edited:
I was going to buy the Daily Mail today to burn it but then I thought I'm not throwing hard cash at rubbish so instead I purchased some E liquid for my £1 :D
 
Back
Top Bottom