vapemac
Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2016
- Messages
- 8,586
Ive only managed to decipher a few things from this.
1) It is a study on metals found in vapour and tests were done on the juice in the bottle, juice in the tank, and the vapour produced.
2) Strangely it shows that there are more trace metals present in the liquid in the tank, than the vapour produced, with metal traces in the bottle reading the lowest.
3) Even stranger is the presence of trace metals in the bottle in the first place and if the levels in all samples were the same i would assume they were naturally occuring trace elements but the amounts of trace elements varied from liquid sample to liquid sample.
I could summarise but am probably assuming in the absence of any other plausible explanation that this could be due to the differing vessels used from liquid to liquid during the manufactoring process.
4) Further puzzlement comes from the results showing that vapour has lower levels of trace metals than the juice in the tank which suggests it cant be the coils contributing to their presence and in fact the vapourising process removes/reduces trace metal levels.
5) I found very little information to clarify what devises were used although it was stated the equipment was provided by 56 every day vapers who agreed to participate in the study and brought their own vape gear.
Thank you for that
So is the assumption that the trace metals are occurring when the juice reacts with the metal in the tank as opposed to the coils? Or have they fucked up and tainted their tank samples? Is that even possible?
Doesn't make a whole lot of sense really and isn't conclusive until they can find out why the levels of trace metals increase after being put in the tank. And wouldn't it have made more sense to use the same gear for each Vaper so that they could get an accurate test of the different juice samples? 56 tanks and coils seem like an awful lot of variables.