Dear Ladies, Gentlemen and MerinoTeflon,
I'd just like to take a moment to address this thread.
It seems that things haven't been handled particularly well here and I'd like to wade in a put some truths out there.
In this, as in most things, POTV are assuming impartiality here, we are purely posting the reply we received from UKecigStore and do not want to be seen as supporting one "side" or the other. Personally I can see both sides of the argument and whilst opinions are being exchanged only hope that we can try and remain impartial and unstained from any thrown... er... mud.
This seems to be one of those terrible situations that has made us seem biased when in fact we are trying to acheive the opposite. I know auctions can run wild, especially when hijacked and I also know that perhaps this situation could have been managed better from the start by the vendor concerned but it is what it is, and I will admit that the 15% discount offered to POTV members, whilst very generous, is probably not the best way to handle it and could be conceived as a bit tacky.
IMO the vendor needs to mark this up to experience and the members need to decide whether they will buy from them in the future or not. It need only be that simple!
I will re-open this thread now for your comments and hope we can use this thread as intended - a place for debate on a subject that in some way escalated.
Thanks,
OS