Cummings and goings

[Crewella]

I laughed, a lot ................ but I also agreed with every word.

 

["Misfit"]

I agree that doesn't look good but coupled with the reasons he gave for doing so and no proof he did anything else other than what he said he did, he has his arse covered.

What would have happened if he had got into an accident and killed someone while driving
knowing he had dodgy eyesight.
This would be a murder charge.

 

[Mitz]

What would have happened if he had got into an accident and killed someone while driving
knowing he had dodgy eyesight.
This would be a murder charge.

No, it wouldn't. Murder has to be premeditated. At worst it could be manslaughter.

 

["Misfit"]

Spot on

 

["Misfit"]

No, it wouldn't. Murder has to be premeditated. At worst it could be manslaughter.

Agreed, doesnt make it much better though/

 

[Enoch]

So did he say what they did drive to Durham for?

To go and stay on the property . But not near his family , not near his elderly parents , only his sister and her niece which he said they shouted conversations to each other.

That's the issue with it all. He had zero reason to go there and he said it himself. Noone called him on that point yesterday but it was his own words to say he didn't travel for childcare.

So any travel he did do was unnecessary given he should have stayed at home isolating. Pretty much , he travelled north because he wanted to isolate in a nicer area.

You can take his story on face value or you can see none of it makes sense. Given his role is a chief advisor to the prime minister , it's frightening that he can't offer a coherent story.

 

[Mr Ripple]

To go and stay on the property . But not near his family , not near his elderly parents , only his sister and her niece which he said they shouted conversations to each other.

That's the issue with it all. He had zero reason to go there and he said it himself. Noone called him on that point yesterday but it was his own words to say he didn't travel for childcare.

So any travel he did do was unnecessary given he should have stayed at home isolating. Pretty much , he travelled north because he wanted to isolate in a nicer area.

You can take his story on face value or you can see none of it makes sense. Given his role is a chief advisor to the prime minister , it's frightening that he can't offer a coherent story.

This is the issue with this thread.
Everyone having their two penneth worth is doing so based on information they have gathered form many different sources.
Much of the information is conflicting which is adding to the varying opinions on here as to what actually happened and what was actually said.

Your post for instance contains information that is wrong based on the first 6.15 of this video.

 

[Crewella]

Read this ............. I must find another word for 'interesting' ...............

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/o...ium=article_page&utm_campaign=read_more_links

 

[Crewella]

This is the issue with this thread.
Everyone having their two penneth worth is doing so based on information they have gathered form many different sources.
Much of the information is conflicting which is adding to the varying opinions on here as to what actually happened and what was actually said.

Your post for instance contains information that is wrong based on the first 6.15 of this video.

Is that an issue though? To me it's just a discussion. I like forums BECAUSE you get different views - I learn from that and sometimes get things straighter in my head because it's been talked out?

 

[vapemac]

Regardless of whether you believe him or not, we're now at a stage where his position within government is untenable.

In order for us to progress, he needs to go.