do you not know how the media works? photos of this sort are always staged. identifying that a photo is staged isn’t evidence that the thing being reported is fake. you should really stay away from these strange websites you frequent, they aren’t good for the psychological state.
Do you know how to read & comprehend ???
Of course the photo opportunity was "staged"
The fact a photographer captures the moment a vaccine jab is to be given was no spur of the moment event, but most certainly preplanned. Which was the used to promote getting a flu jab for Londoners...
Yup it is pretty obvious that it was staged, that is not really in question here...
What the article pointed to was just how poorly it was staged.
Personally I do not care if Khan actually got the flu jab, he may have already recently had the jab or decided for personal reasons not to actually have it.
But if he was hoping to promote the jab, then perhaps the staged PR stunt missed its mark if it was poorly planned showing the needle seemingly ready to administer the vaccine with the cap still on.
Which if the cap is still on, was it removed to measure out the dosage, then replaced for the photo, or just an empty syringe for the photo ???
(Me thinks the later for the staged photo op).
The event was staged, no denying that, but staged poorly in the photograph used.
Having to use a so called factchecking site to try to counter the scepticism resulting from his own poorly staged photo PR stunt does not prove beyond any doubt he received the jab.
The scepticism and/or mocking of the PR stunt only came about from his team organising/staging it (poorly).
If it was not staged so poorly or the photograph used did not contain possible errors then it would not be the subject of you trying to argue with me yet again
