What's new

I'm having the vaccine when it comes out poll

will you have the jab

  • i have no choice as its part of my work

    Votes: 3 3.4%
  • give me the jab baby

    Votes: 52 59.1%
  • no it tracks you its got a chip in it

    Votes: 3 3.4%
  • no I'm not keen....going to wait a while

    Votes: 26 29.5%
  • Banana (control group thing)

    Votes: 4 4.5%

  • Total voters
    88
Do you know how to read & comprehend ???

Of course the photo opportunity was "staged"
The fact a photographer captures the moment a vaccine jab is to be given was no spur of the moment event, but most certainly preplanned. Which was the used to promote getting a flu jab for Londoners...

Yup it is pretty obvious that it was staged, that is not really in question here...

What the article pointed to was just how poorly it was staged.

Personally I do not care if Khan actually got the flu jab, he may have already recently had the jab or decided for personal reasons not to actually have it.

But if he was hoping to promote the jab, then perhaps the staged PR stunt missed its mark if it was poorly planned showing the needle seemingly ready to administer the vaccine with the cap still on.
Which if the cap is still on, was it removed to measure out the dosage, then replaced for the photo, or just an empty syringe for the photo ???
(Me thinks the later for the staged photo op).

The event was staged, no denying that, but staged poorly in the photograph used.
Having to use a so called factchecking site to try to counter the scepticism resulting from his own poorly staged photo PR stunt does not prove beyond any doubt he received the jab.
The scepticism and/or mocking of the PR stunt only came about from his team organising/staging the visiting (poorly).

If it was not staged so poorly or the photograph used did not contain possible errors then it would not be the subject of you trying to argue with me yet again
I'm just relieved it wasn't staged in a car park between a crematorium and an adult book store ................ ;)
 
I will give it to him free service I will even grin like a Cheshire cat for the cameras

"small prick matt"

Mr Hancock, the doctor will see you now for your jab...

images
 
I'm just relieved it wasn't staged in a car park between a crematorium and an adult book store ................ ;)

at least you would have something to read whilst waiting
& if things didn't work out, the final destination is close to hand
 
So am I right in saying boris went on the news the bbc news app title is

“the scientists have done it says PM after vaccine approval”

to the lay man or the conversation I heard today whilst filling up

“Boris has the new vaccine covid is over”

no it’s fucking not Jesus why publish such a stupid headline
 
Do you know how to read & comprehend ???

Of course the photo opportunity was "staged"
The fact a photographer captures the moment a vaccine jab is to be given was no spur of the moment event, but most certainly preplanned. Which was the used to promote getting a flu jab for Londoners...

Yup it is pretty obvious that it was staged, that is not really in question here...

What the article pointed to was just how poorly it was staged.

Personally I do not care if Khan actually got the flu jab, he may have already recently had the jab or decided for personal reasons not to actually have it.

But if he was hoping to promote the jab, then perhaps the staged PR stunt missed its mark if it was poorly planned showing the needle seemingly ready to administer the vaccine with the cap still on.
Which if the cap is still on, was it removed to measure out the dosage, then replaced for the photo, or just an empty syringe for the photo ???
(Me thinks the later for the staged photo op).

The event was staged, no denying that, but staged poorly in the photograph used.
Having to use a so called factchecking site to try to counter the scepticism resulting from his own poorly staged photo PR stunt does not prove beyond any doubt he received the jab.
The scepticism and/or mocking of the PR stunt only came about from his team organising/staging it (poorly).

If it was not staged so poorly or the photograph used did not contain possible errors then it would not be the subject of you trying to argue with me yet again

sorry, i honestly forget what your point was.
 
So am I right in saying boris went on the news the bbc news app title is

“the scientists have done it says PM after vaccine approval”

to the lay man or the conversation I heard today whilst filling up

“Boris has the new vaccine covid is over”

no it’s fucking not Jesus why publish such a stupid headline

Blame the media, the way stories are presented and how the public perceive it
according to BBC the jab offers 100% full immunity as the calender appears to show...

_115770716_aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaavaccine_dose_calendar_640_3x-nc.png


Full immunity, well 90% effective they say, not quite full immunity as it "may" appear
though full effect from the vaccine (with its 90% success rate or effective)

But at first glance if anybody foolishly took the pic at face value
it seems to imply after 28 days you are fully immune from COVID

Doesn't matter what details are listed & explained
these days pics/memes quickly resonate the message with greater impact than lots of text

Too easy to take stuff out of context if you are not able to decipher plain English & comprehend like some

sorry, i honestly forget what your point was.

I rest my case
 
I’m sure they will ask people about that before they offer it, like they do with the Flu jab. There is going to be a minority of people who the vaccine just won’t be suitable for.

Thank you, I found this:

Anaphylaxis is a very rare, recognised side effect of most vaccines and suspected cases should be reported via the Coronavirus Yellow Card Scheme (www.coronavirus-yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk). Chapter 8 of the Green Book gives detailed guidance on distinguishing between faints, panic attacks and the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis. If a case of suspected anaphylaxis meets the clinical features described in Chapter 8, this should be reported via the Yellow Card Scheme as a case of ‘anaphylaxis’ (or if appropriate ‘anaphylactoid reaction’). Cases of less severe allergic reactions (i.e. not including the clinical features of anaphylaxis) should not be reported as anaphylaxis but as ‘allergic reaction’. As these vaccines are labelled with a black triangle, all adverse reactions occurring in individuals of any age after vaccination should be reported to the MHRA using the Yellow Card Scheme. Anyone can report a suspected adverse reaction to the Medical and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) using the Yellow Card reporting scheme (www.yellowcard.gov.uk). Any adverse reaction should also be documented in accordance with local procedures.

https://assets.publishing.service.g...bject_to_MHRA_approval_of_vaccine_supply_.pdf
 
Social media is frightening today. The level of scientific illiteracy in this country is beyond belief.
 
Back
Top Bottom