What's new

Lockdown V3

I can see the 5% number here...

https://www.planetofthevapes.co.uk/forums/threads/lockdown-v3.202421/page-9#post-2337734

@StrawberryRipple quotes the number but he hasn't said where it comes from so it could be typo in his post or the source.
A quick search of BBC news implies the number should be 50% but I don't know if that's a corrected number or the wrong source.
Who the fuck knows?
I don't believe most of the figures on "here" apart from @Mawsley ,of course, because he's extremely trustworthy and not at all perverted. :)
I cut and pasted the info from the Evening Standard.
Couldn't find the article later so linked the one from the independent which read pretty much the same.
Went back to the independent later on and it had been edited.
 
Either way, both figures are 'made up' ... nobody actually knows. They are 'estimated to be' or 'our best guess at the moment' or 'all the indicators point towards it being' ... so I wouldn't worry about it, it's not going to change anything in a practical sense for us.

The media were saying 70% for a while. :D
 
I think there must be more to it .... what's the issue here? The fact she stopped to sit for a while, or the fact she had a cup of coffee? neither of those make any sense.

... plus there's plenty of other people around in that clip, even people filming it who aren't being nicked.
Here's another video posted by someone else and the police were saying she had been seen at other places elsewhere.

 
I cut and pasted the info from the Evening Standard.
Couldn't find the article later so linked the one from the independent which read pretty much the same.
Went back to the independent later on and it had been edited.
It's comforting that Donald Trump will fuck up his last ditch attempt at nuclear codery with a typo. :)
 
Here it is and still says 5%

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/...ates-chris-whitty-adverts-b777425.html?page=3

20210110_125806.jpg
 

Also, scroll down the page and it says...

"He added: “Because we have the more infectious variant, which is somewhere around 50% more infectious than last time round in March, that means that if we were to achieve the same result as we got in March we would have to have a stricter lockdown, and it’s not stricter. It’s actually less strict.”

You'd think they'd employ someone to proofread and edit, wouldn't you? Wankers!
 
Well I think it’s 2% more infectious, and I got this information from Trevor. Trevor inscribed said information on a tree with a penknife, just underneath where he’d inscribed ‘Trevor 4 Mandy 4 eva’ encased in a lovingly crafted (and not at all artistic), heart.

And you know what? I believe Trevor more. And @Mawsley like @knome said - although I’d argue that @Mawsley is very, very perverted, but that may just be when he is looking at pictures of genetically modified cacti.
 
Back
Top Bottom