Sly Pandemia
Postman
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2014
- Messages
- 107
The government justifies its widening of the tax net "for reasons of public health as well as tax equity, since they are products that are presented as substitutes for tobacco."
You couldn't make this up. Take a product for which a major selling point is that it's NOT tobacco. Assert that by being so emphatically not tobacco, it must be a tobacco substitute. Therefore it should be regulated like tobacco, and taxed accordingly. Because it's not fair on the tobacco companies that certain products evade tobacco tax simply because they aren't tobacco. Claim that this is also good for public health because we know how bad for you tobacco is and obviously this extends to stuff which isn't tobacco too.
By this logic they could heavily tax mineral water because it's a vodka substitute.
You couldn't make this up. Take a product for which a major selling point is that it's NOT tobacco. Assert that by being so emphatically not tobacco, it must be a tobacco substitute. Therefore it should be regulated like tobacco, and taxed accordingly. Because it's not fair on the tobacco companies that certain products evade tobacco tax simply because they aren't tobacco. Claim that this is also good for public health because we know how bad for you tobacco is and obviously this extends to stuff which isn't tobacco too.
By this logic they could heavily tax mineral water because it's a vodka substitute.