What's new

reply from Martin Callanan RE EU Ruling

Phantom Diablo

Achiever
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
3,087
just got this today after i had fired off an email a couple of weeks ago to Martin Schulz which was CC'ed to several other MEP's and the like
the reply is as follows

Thank you for copying me in to your correspondence with Martin Schulz. I am very grateful to you, and to many others, who have taken the time to lobby Mr Schulz regarding e-cigarettes.

I have been following this file on behalf of the Conservatives. Since the beginning of this process I have been convinced of the merits of e-cigarettes, and the significant benefits that they offer to public health.

With this in mind, when my colleagues and I were able to rally the rest of the Parliament to support us in changing the original text relating to e-cigarettes, we were delighted. However, when it came to negotiating with the Council and Commission, many other groups agreed to sacrifice the Parliament's flexible approach to e-cigarettes, in favour of the Council's highly limited approach.

Before the Directive as a whole comes before the Parliament for a final vote on February 26th, we are doing our utmost to persuade Mr Schulz to allow the text to be opened to splits and separates (as you request) so that this unfair treatment of e-cigarettes can be properly addressed.

The original purpose of the Tobacco Products Directive was to reducing smoking in Europe, especially with regard to young people. Therefore to highly limit access to a device which is proven to help people give up tobacco is ridiculous. The negotiations were rushed, and the authenticity of evidence presented in favour of making e-cigarettes medicinal products has since been called in to question. All in all this makes a very unsatisfactory situation.

I would therefore like to thank you for voicing your concerns for Mr Schulz, and calling for the TPD Plenary vote to be opened up to splits and separates. I truly hope that he sees sense in his decision, and enables us to try and get a fair outcome for e-cigarettes.

Yours Sincerely,

Martin Callanan
Conservative Member of the European Parliament for the North East
Leader, European Conservatives and Reformists Group
 
just got this today after i had fired off an email a couple of weeks ago to Martin Schulz which was CC'ed to several other MEP's and the like
the reply is as follows

Thank you for copying me in to your correspondence with Martin Schulz. I am very grateful to you, and to many others, who have taken the time to lobby Mr Schulz regarding e-cigarettes.

I have been following this file on behalf of the Conservatives. Since the beginning of this process I have been convinced of the merits of e-cigarettes, and the significant benefits that they offer to public health.

With this in mind, when my colleagues and I were able to rally the rest of the Parliament to support us in changing the original text relating to e-cigarettes, we were delighted. However, when it came to negotiating with the Council and Commission, many other groups agreed to sacrifice the Parliament's flexible approach to e-cigarettes, in favour of the Council's highly limited approach.

Before the Directive as a whole comes before the Parliament for a final vote on February 26th, we are doing our utmost to persuade Mr Schulz to allow the text to be opened to splits and separates (as you request) so that this unfair treatment of e-cigarettes can be properly addressed.

The original purpose of the Tobacco Products Directive was to reducing smoking in Europe, especially with regard to young people. Therefore to highly limit access to a device which is proven to help people give up tobacco is ridiculous. The negotiations were rushed, and the authenticity of evidence presented in favour of making e-cigarettes medicinal products has since been called in to question. All in all this makes a very unsatisfactory situation.

I would therefore like to thank you for voicing your concerns for Mr Schulz, and calling for the TPD Plenary vote to be opened up to splits and separates. I truly hope that he sees sense in his decision, and enables us to try and get a fair outcome for e-cigarettes.

Yours Sincerely,

Martin Callanan
Conservative Member of the European Parliament for the North East
Leader, European Conservatives and Reformists Group

Crikey... this reads like actual acceptance of the situation, a desire to do the right thing and not just an acknowledging brush off.

Good on you for emailing and good on him for listening and understanding.

Just need Mr Schulz to agree to act in the spirit of democracy and prove he's not a corrupt sell out now.
 
Well done that man. There are more good points in our favour in black & white now.

The original purpose of the Tobacco Products Directive was to reducing smoking in Europe, especially with regard to young people. Therefore to highly limit access to a device which is proven to help people give up tobacco is ridiculous.

That bit .
 
better than the lib dems theyre quite happy to look at split and seperate after the TPD vote next week theyre definitely hedging their bets
 
Back
Top Bottom