Actually, I have realised that this is a very bad analogy. This discussion is not about vape snobbery per se, it is about how clones are perceived.
My car analogy would equate to the snobbery of someone using an expensive and exclusive high-end tank looking down their nose at someone using a 4 year old Nautilus tank that was readily available and relatively cheap at the time. Or people using Asmodus or DNA boards deriding those who use SMOK mods. That isn't what this is about.
This is about clones.
Why do they exist, and why do people buy them? Do these two questions have the same answer?
In most instances of cloning items, say in the fashion trade - like fake Louis Vuitton bags, people buy them in order to convey a false impression of prestige. It is about how you look to others. I doubt anyone considers how the bag will perform in comparison to the original, as the performance aspect is not the reason they are buying it. They want to look good in front of their friends, it's a game of one-upmanship.
I doubt very much the same is true about cloned atties. Or if that is the case (cue some snobbery ironically!), it might be some snap-back wearing immature teenager wanting to pretend amongst his peer group that he has money to burn. But that is not the reason WE buy clones, is it? We buy them because we want the performance to be as close to the original as we can get (either because of financial constraints, or lack of availability of the original). We aren't trying to pass them off as original in order to impress people, and this is something that seem peculiar to the vape industry when considered in relation to other forms of clone or counterfeit goods.
So, why did I hear, for instance, in the case of VapeFest, some people saying words to the effect of "don't take clones to VapeFest" ? Hmmm ?