nikki from mars
Achiever
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2013
- Messages
- 4,992
And... "Regarding outcome, 23.7% of cases required hospitalisation and 6.8% had a moderate or major effect." So what I want to know is how come 23.7% of cases supposedly required hospitalisation and yet only 6.8% had even a moderate/major effect on the persons poisoned... that just is utter bollocksBriefly scanned that link (as that's all it deserves) and 2 immediate questions:
"The Commission poses the amount of e-liquid needed to produce an acutely toxic effect through dermal exposure in humans is 35 ml for a small child and 210 ml for a 60kg adult (larger than the maximum size of a refill container allowed under the TPD)."
35ml/210ml of what nicotine strength?? that'd make a big difference
"277 cases of nicotine poisoning were identified being reported to poison centres in eight EU Member States (Austria, Hungary, Ireland, Lithuania, Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden and Slovenia) from January 2012 to March 2015:
That's 92 poisonings! I wonder how the media missed such an epidemic? doesn't sound right somehow
- 33.2% of cases related to children aged five or under"
Also we know that more children than this are poisoned every year by household products with no restrictions on them.. and more children are poisoned by eating cigarettes.. than by ingesting eliquid... because most people treat eliquid with more respect