What the NHS have to put up with

[zouzounaki]

I guess it's your perogative to make up the definitions as you go along ............. but whether you're interested or not, this is what Wiki says!

Freedom of speech[2] is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction. The term freedom of expression is usually used synonymously but, in legal sense, includes any activity of seeking, receiving, and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.​

i’m not making up a definition, just thinking about what it actually means. who would protect it? would it be some kind of state sanctioned ban on retaliating against people who express particular ideas?

i don’t know, maybe i’ve just never felt that my freedom to speak has been threatened, and it seems to me a bit bogus.

can we not all just get along?

 

[Crewella]

i’m not making up a definition, just thinking about what it actually means. who would protect it? would it be some kind of state sanctioned ban on retaliating against people who express particular ideas?

i don’t know, maybe i’ve just never felt that my freedom to speak has been threatened, and it seems to me a bit bogus.

can we not all just get along?

Knock yourself out ............. read the rest ................

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech

The right to freedom of expression is recognized as a human right under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Article 19 of the UDHR states that "everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference" and "everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice". The version of Article 19 in the ICCPR later amends this by stating that the exercise of these rights carries "special duties and responsibilities" and may "therefore be subject to certain restrictions" when necessary "[f]or respect of the rights or reputation of others" or "[f]or the protection of national security or of public order (order public), or of public health or morals".[3]

​

 

[knome]

... and probably in here, but I ain't reading it...

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents

 

[OzoreXS]

meanwhile @Social Misfit

 

[zouzounaki]

Knock yourself out ............. read the rest ................

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech

The right to freedom of expression is recognized as a human right under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Article 19 of the UDHR states that "everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference" and "everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice". The version of Article 19 in the ICCPR later amends this by stating that the exercise of these rights carries "special duties and responsibilities" and may "therefore be subject to certain restrictions" when necessary "[f]or respect of the rights or reputation of others" or "[f]or the protection of national security or of public order (order public), or of public health or morals".[3]

​

i do t think this is the same as what we are talking about. but
don’t worry it’s probably just my white male privilege.

... and probably in here, but I ain't reading it...

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents

that just points you to the convention article.

 

[andipandi]

Maybe there's something wrong with me, but I do feel sorry for the chap.

 

[Crewella]

i do t think this is the same as what we are talking about. but
don’t worry it’s probably just my white male privilege.



that just points you to the convention article.

If we're all going to get along .......... it does help if we're discussing the same thing in the first place?

 

[vapesmarter]

Maybe there's something wrong with me, but I do feel sorry for the chap.

View attachment 238329

hes a broken man after all it’s not everyday one man takes the responsibility of 100 thousand dead

trouble is Churchill and all the other what most people think great or leaders would never showed sorrow does this make him a normal man or a bad leader

even thatcher who lots of people hate wrote personally to even fallen solder family who died in the Falklands war

it depends “you’ve been publicly shamed” I’m not sure after tonight he will build back better

 

[Mawsley]

Maybe there's something wrong with me, but I do feel sorry for the chap.

View attachment 238329

 

[zouzounaki]

If we're all going to get along .......... it does help if we're discussing the same thing in the first place?

i’ll just leave this for you.