Mark
Legend
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- Messages
- 13,961
View attachment 32122.
The WHO have apparently responded to Clive Bates criticism of their latest paper. How? By dealing with the issues raised? By producing the evidence to support their arguments?
Nope
By threatening legal action for disfiguring their logo and mentioning the WHO and suggesting they may be responsible for their actions
When we think that 24% of their funding is government based and the rest from 'individuals' we pause to think where their motivation comes from. When they cannot tolerate legitimate democratic criticism of their actions and respond in this way what else is left to conclude about this organisation?
WHO responds to criticism over e-cigarettes with attempted censorship | Anti-THR Lies and related topics
The WHO have apparently responded to Clive Bates criticism of their latest paper. How? By dealing with the issues raised? By producing the evidence to support their arguments?
Nope
By threatening legal action for disfiguring their logo and mentioning the WHO and suggesting they may be responsible for their actions
When we think that 24% of their funding is government based and the rest from 'individuals' we pause to think where their motivation comes from. When they cannot tolerate legitimate democratic criticism of their actions and respond in this way what else is left to conclude about this organisation?
WHO responds to criticism over e-cigarettes with attempted censorship | Anti-THR Lies and related topics