LilyRed
Postman
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
- Messages
- 695
Hmm, yet another article guilty of misrepresentation - although the reporter suggests that the current LD50 for nicotine is incorrect and could be much higher, sadly he didn't read his research material correctly.
The liquid he chose to demonstrate the main point of the article - containing 72mg of nicotine shock horror - is of course for mixing and NOT for straight vaping. If he'd only read to the bottom of the page he linked to, he'd have found this out ... but hey, never let the truth get in the way of a good story, eh?
http://www.kpbs.org/news/2014/mar/28/e-cigarette-overdose-how-much-liquid-nicotine-woul/
The liquid he chose to demonstrate the main point of the article - containing 72mg of nicotine shock horror - is of course for mixing and NOT for straight vaping. If he'd only read to the bottom of the page he linked to, he'd have found this out ... but hey, never let the truth get in the way of a good story, eh?
http://www.kpbs.org/news/2014/mar/28/e-cigarette-overdose-how-much-liquid-nicotine-woul/