andipandi
Legend
- Joined
- May 29, 2015
- Messages
- 20,326
We need some boobs
Pics of pussy is much better than pics of cats, thank you!
We need some boobs
I didn't say people hadn't died of Covid, I said we don't know the exact number, because anyone who dies in Hospital within 28 day's of a positive test goes on the statistics, you could die within 28 day's of having an STD, it doesn't mean you died of an STD !!!What exactly do you mean by "As a direct result of the virus" ? There are people who have been/ will be included in the covid death stats, who didn't die of covid and there are people who died as a result of catching covid, who won't or haven't been included in the covid death stats. I would say that we will never know the true and accurate figures, re covid deaths. Just because we don't and probably won't ever know the true figure it doesn't diminish the fact that lots of people have died and will die, to quote Boris "Before their time", as a result from catching covid.
There are shit tons of factual and obituary style articles, cluttered all over the net from the family, friends & colleagues of people who have died, as a result of catching covid, i don't think those families, friends and colleagues are lying.
I didn't say people hadn't died of Covid, I said we don't know the exact number, because anyone who dies in Hospital within 28 day's of a positive test goes on the statistics, you could die within 28 day's of having an STD, it doesn't mean you died of an STD !!!
I absolutely agree 100% with the widespread sentiment that a very large part of the MSM are sensation seeking, event hyping, cockwombles. BUT, I would question what the contributing factors are. You asked for Covid only deaths. That's basically people with no other health conditions to my ears. So what are the underlying health issues that constitute contributing factors. If it's asthma, obesity, diabetes, hypertension and many of the other very manable and treatable conditions that people can live entire lifetimes with then it really doesn't detract from the officially stated numbers in my eyes.I hear you H. I think they’re fiddling the figures to add to the psychological impact too.
Like so. You’re looking at the red area at the top which is served by the three hospitals on the letter from North Wales NHS. The news reports 521 deaths, the letter 23 with C19 as the ONLY cause.
Don’t get me wrong, covid could’ve bought on a heart attack, haemorrhage etc etc, but then when you throw something else in the mix the figure has to be diluted somewhat, and that’s a potential 93% of the media quoted figures that are skewed. Apply that to the whole of the UK then there’s a real conundrum in the maths department.
Having said all that shit it is a real thing, I’m convinced I’ve had it, I know my brother and his family has too, and I’ve no doubt it can cause some catastrophic harm. But with media opting for the dramatic it’s bound to sway some of the public’s opinion on the pandemic as a whole.
View attachment 235185
View attachment 235186
I absolutely agree 100% that a very large part of the MSM are sensation seeking, event hyping, cockwombles. BUT, I would wonder what the contributing factors are. You asked for Covid only deaths. That's basically people with no other health conditions to my ears. So what are the underlying health issues that constitute contributing factors. If it's asthma, obesity, diabetes, hypertension and many of the other very manable and treatable conditions that people live lifetimes with then it really doesn't detract from the officially stated numbers in my eyes.
Not arguing mate. Just chatting. Unfortunately, the 24hr news cycle doesn't help. I remember growing up and the news would be on at 6am, 1pm and 10pm. Now it's on a dozen channels 24hrs a day. With so many people at home around the clock I have no doubt it makes up a lot of people's daily viewing. Personally, I stopped watching the news entirely for around 3 months. Now I watch a bit but mostly CNN because I can never get enough of listening to people slamming Trump. Even mental health professionals at the beggining of the pandemic were recommending publicly to limit daily news intake. The current constant 24hr cycle sucks balls IMHO.I get that mate, and I’m not here to argue with you because I agree with a lot of what you’ve said up to this point to be honest, and truth be told the real truth probably lies somewhere between our opinions anyway because neither of us are privy to cold, hard government facts.
Like it said, it’s potentially catastrophic and 100% needs addressing - but making people scared of anything unnecessarily is a bad move because breeding fear will also have negative long term effects.
So yeah, not disagreeing , at all, but we don’t know because they’re not telling us. And that stinks.
Not arguing mate. Just chatting. Unfortunately, the 24hr news cycle doesn't help. I remember growing up and the news would be on at 6am, 1pm and 10pm. Now it's on a dozen channels 24hrs a day. With so many people at home around the clock I have no doubt it makes up a lot of people's daily viewing. Personally, I stopped watching the news entirely for around 3 months. Now I watch a bit but mostly CNN because I can never get enough of listening to people slamming Trump. Even mental health professionals at the beggining of the pandemic were recommending publicly to limit daily news intake. The current constant 24hr cycle sucks balls IMHO.
What ?
If you have something to say, then say it.
If not, don't make meaningless posts.