I went to the asthma clinic last week - told the nurse I've quit smoking and now vape - she put me down as an ex-smoker. If health professionals can see the benefits, why can't the bl**dy politicians and people in higher places?!
I had a similar experience, I tried the stop smoking crap from the NHS and went back to smoking(for the 9th time) after 2 weeks, told the nurse running it that I was going to try using an e-cig to quit. Instantly the nurse got several doctors into the room and they all ranted and raved about how e-cigs were not safe, were dangerous, and that they would not treat my asthma if I took up vapeing.
After 3 months I went in to the asthma clinic again to see how it was doing, while smoking I required using my brown(steroid) and blue inhalers 4-5 times a day, 4 puffs on each both times, and still would need the blue one now and then in between. After 3 months of vapeing I started having some major problems with breathing, mainly being very light headed and dizzy. The nurse started the checkup etc and it was determined that I was actually harming myself with the inhalers due to the fact my asthma had cleared up - a LOT. I now only use the inhalers once a day, 2 puffs each, and the blue one on the rare occasion when I need it. Seeing the huge change in such a short time all those doctors and nurses who were berating me and saying they wouldn't treat me, are now firmly encouraging patients(that failed on NRT) to convert to e-cigs to quit smoking.
Will need to go in soon to try and get them all to sign the petition!
I have a theory, I am no doctor nor claim to be, but I recall reading somewhere that PG was intially developed as a method for cleaning hospital wards, in the 1930's I think, the vapour acting as a sterilant or a delivery system for the sterilant. Wish I could remember where I read it. Anyway, my theory is, vaping PG cleans or sterilises the lungs somehow, because before I took up vaping I was in a pretty bad way breathing wise, but now, I feel 10 years younger, I have had no cough or cold in 3 years ... but this is just my theory and should in no way be taken as a scientific fact.
Correct it was used as a sterilizer, in vapour form, it kills bacteria
Some examples of medications that include propylene glycol as an intravenous diluent/solvent include: etomidate, lorazepam, diazepam, esmolol, phenytoin, nitroglycerin, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, hydrocortisone, digoxin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Most significant human toxicity results from exposure to large does of intravenous medications that contain propylene glycol as a solvent/diluent.</pre>
TOXICOLOGY: In general, propylene glycol is considered nontoxic; however, patients receiving large doses (especially by intravenous administration)</pre>
EPIDEMIOLOGY: Significant toxicity is extremely rare, with case reports described in the literature developing after rapid intravenous administration or prolonged intravenous infusion of drugs with propylene glycol as a diluent.</pre>
WITH THERAPEUTIC USE 1) No adverse effects are expected from propylene glycol when administered in therapeutic doses to healthy individuals.</pre>
Propylene glycol was not carcinogenic in experimental animals.</pre>
</pre>
Hydroscopic agents (eg, propylene glycol...) are added /to respiratory inhalants/ to reduce viscosity of bronchial secretions.