What's new

Heads up Vendors :P

I think that the way the TVECA letter is worded it does come across as authoritative and supported by a large % of industry.

I can see the argument that "this isn't a terrible compromise, and not long ago we didn't think we'd even get that" that FA and others are saying, but the present text of article 18 bans flavours for e-liquids by virtue of the fact that it bans labelling of said flavours. It's just a giant mess and I think that it would be much better to throw the whole lot out rather than patch it up even more and make it longer and even more complicated.

If we end up with this as law it's not the end of the world, but we can do so much better. Which is why my views line up with ECITA's take on article 18 and the TPD and not TVECAs.
 
WELL MINES A BIT ROUGH ROUND THE EDGES BUT WELLL SO AM I SAYS ON MY HOME PAGE

announcement
!! the pirate is highly opposed to the
[h=2] TVECA bull$$^t !![/h]
 
WELL MINES A BIT ROUGH ROUND THE EDGES BUT WELLL SO AM I SAYS ON MY HOME PAGE

announcement
!! the pirate is highly opposed to the
[h=2] TVECA bull$$^t !![/h]

There's nowt wrong with saying it how it is imo.
 
Just to clarify (or what it looks like to me), the helpdesk link was shared on Twitter and most of the responses further down are by other viewers rather than Matt
 
Back
Top Bottom