What's new

Progress in UK Parliament!

OccultScientist

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
20,349
ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES


Session: 2014-15
Date tabled: 04.06.2014
Primary sponsor: Joyce, Eric
Sponsors: Corbyn, Jeremy


That this House notes the opinion of leading world public health experts, including Professor Robert West of University College, London, that e-cigarettes have the potential to save hundreds of millions of lives across the world; believes that, if regulators treat low-risk nicotine products as traditional tobacco products, they are improperly defining them; regrets the decision of the EU to regulate e-cigarettes in strange and contradictory ways and believes that such inappropriate constraints upon the labelling and sale of e-cigarettes will have the perverse effect of reducing the rate at which cigarette use is declining; further notes the potentially enormous health benefits that e-cigarettes could bring to developing nations; accepts the health and economic benefits which e-cigarettes can bring to the least well-off; urges public authorities to regard e-cigarettes as a positive and not as an equivalent to cigarettes; and further urges the Government to impress upon the World Heath Organisation that encouraging, rather than discouraging, e-cigarette manufacture, sale and use will bring great health benefits across the world.

SOURCE: Early day motion 6 - ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES - UK Parliament
 
Just watched all about this on VTTV,and a bucket load of other great stuff from the shows guests and the always awesome Clive Bates,it seems the tide is indeed turning in favour of us vapers :thumbup:
 
Nice to see the 2x signatures has just turned into 4!

Winner!

Aye. Hearts and minds - once you have Labour members siding with reason and good science you're on your way.

Still doesn't defeat big cash, but it goes a fair way.
 
Aye. Hearts and minds - once you have Labour members siding with reason and good science you're on your way.

Still doesn't defeat big cash, but it goes a fair way.
Surely by now they must be realising that they are losing a lot of cash by people switching already so if they get on side they can make money from us? I know it's not the same as pharma back handers and I'd rather it wasn't taxed, but if it means they will piss off and leave us alone to make our own educated lifestyle choices then I don't mind them taking a small cut of the profits.
 
Surely by now they must be realising that they are losing a lot of cash by people switching already so if they get on side they can make money from us? I know it's not the same as pharma back handers and I'd rather it wasn't taxed, but if it means they will piss off and leave us alone to make our own educated lifestyle choices then I don't mind them taking a small cut of the profits.

+1

I know the cash is an incentive to a lot of people but for me now it's a hobby I wouldn't mind spending as much as I did on smoking if it meant I could vape how I vape now.
 
Surely by now they must be realising that they are losing a lot of cash by people switching already so if they get on side they can make money from us? I know it's not the same as pharma back handers and I'd rather it wasn't taxed, but if it means they will piss off and leave us alone to make our own educated lifestyle choices then I don't mind them taking a small cut of the profits.

The stats don't bear that out though - revenue has increased to the exchequer and profits are stable for the baccy companies despite a drop in numbers through increased taxation.

here

Pharma are the only ones really concerned because of the gross (and by that I mean abhorrent) profits they make from cancer treatment.

NRT is a piss in the ocean for them, the UK market value only runs to £200million.
 
Pharma are the only ones really concerned because of the gross (and by that I mean abhorrent) profits they make from cancer treatment.

.

Don't forget heart disease, strokes, Copd, asthma, erectile dysfunction ( Viagra) etc too :(
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom