Royal Thieving Mail

[phatbhoy]

Just received my latest Big Juice flavour order from the thieving bastards at Royal mail.

It was packaged well enough in a padded 'Jiffy' bag, with a 'thank you' sticker sealing down the flap (perhaps indicative of past 'difficulties' re delivery of complete orders?). However there was a sharp neat slit a couple of inches long in the top flap and the two largest bottles of concentrate were missing. The 4 smaller bottles packaged together in a sealed bag were lodged in the bottom of the bag. I am almost certain the cut in the top flap was unlikely to be caused in normal handling so, whatever the thieving bastard postie thought was in the package.......I hope you were fucking disappointed you prick/ess

 

[andipandi]

Cunt

 

[phatbhoy]

Big Juice answered my email within 5 mins and had replacements sent out next day del........pretty good.
As for RM, I hope they sell you off to some heartless hedge fund ya bunch of stealy thiefs!!

 

[Mr Ripple]

Big Juice answered my email within 5 mins and had replacements sent out next day del........pretty good.

Top service

 

[phatbhoy]

Insult to injury

Those lovely peeps at Big Juice had the missing flaves in my letterbox this morning, turns out I was lucky to get 'em!!. check out the pix, it's not absolutely clear but the envelope was torn open and even the jiffy bag on the inside was burst.....fortunately for the postie it was my missus who fielded the door or.......

 

[andipandi]

Interrogate your postman and stir some shit up. I believe "Interfering with the mail" is an offence under section 84 of the Postal Services Act 2000.

 

[andipandi]

83 Interfering with the mail: postal operators.​

(1)A person who is engaged in the business of a postal operator commits an offence if, contrary to his duty and without reasonable excuse, he—

(a) intentionally delays or opens a postal packet in the course of its transmission by post, or

(b) intentionally opens a mail-bag.

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to the delaying or opening of a postal packet or the opening of a mail-bag under the authority of—

(a) this Act or any other enactment (including, in particular, in pursuance of a warrant issued under any other enactment), F1. . .

F1(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to the delaying or opening of a postal packet in accordance with any terms and conditions applicable to its transmission by post.

(4) Subsection (1) does not apply to the delaying of a postal packet as a result of industrial action in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute.

(5) In subsection (4) “trade dispute” has the meaning given by section 244 of the M1Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 or Article 127 of the M2 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1995; and the reference to industrial action shall be construed in accordance with that Act or (as the case may be) that Order.

(6) A person who commits an offence under subsection (1) shall be liable—

(a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to both,

(b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to both.

84 Interfering with the mail: general.​

(1) A person commits an offence if, without reasonable excuse, he—

(a) intentionally delays or opens a postal packet in the course of its transmission by post, or

(b) intentionally opens a mail-bag.

(2) Subsections (2) to (5) of section 83 apply to subsection (1) above as they apply to subsection (1) of that section.

(3) A person commits an offence if, intending to act to a person’s detriment and without reasonable excuse, he opens a postal packet which he knows or reasonably suspects has been incorrectly delivered to him.

(4) Subsections (2) and (3) of section 83 (so far as they relate to the opening of postal packets) apply to subsection (3) above as they apply to subsection (1) of that section.

(5) A person who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (3) shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to both.

Postal Services Act 2000

An Act to establish the Postal Services Commission and the Consumer Council for Postal Services; to provide for the licensing of certain postal services and for a universal postal service; to provide for the vesting of the property, rights and liabilities of the Post Office in a company...

www.legislation.gov.uk

 

[Rickster]

More likely to be sorting office, postie too obvious

 

[phatbhoy]

Interrogate your postman and stir some shit up. I believe "Interfering with the mail" is an offence under section 84 of the Postal Services Act 2000.

Think @Rickster may have a point re sorting office; yesterday it was our regular postie, with an obvious fine slit along the flap, (she seems too nice to be a thief), today it was parcelforce (big up to Steve at Big Juice) and it was a rough tear with the jiffy obviously 'finger poked' (excuse the double entendre). It is rare for there to be probs re delivery here.....even wi the couriers (hope am no temptin' fate in the run up to Christmas)

 

[Xinte]

I've always got my vape mail unopened , I must just be lucky , a neighbours parcel was delivered to mine opened and it contained something called a "fleshlight" if you know, you know, haha, anyway, should've seen his face when he came to collect the parcel and knew that I knew what he was up to, twas a picture! lol