I'm just starting to feel that it should. Things DO change. 100 years ago pink was viewed as a masculine colour and pale blue was feminine, not so long ago a short skirt and low-cut top was viewed as 'asking for it'. If we all agree that it isn't actually aimed at kids .... then why are we so scared of the accusation? It will never change if people are too scared to say it how it is?
Because I don't think it's defendable.
Let's pretend you've just brought out a juice line with very child-like packaging, childish names, bright colours, ponies and unicorns all that stuff. This would be my accusation to you....
The packaging isn't an accident, you've chosen to go down this route in a meeting, you've all sat around and asked yourselves "how should we market and package this" and you've decided to take all the things associated with Children's sweets, toys, kids food packets, kids drinks, cartoon characters, and to make it look as harmless and fun as possible.
You claim that your product is an adult product, you claim that it should be seen as a serious harm reduction tool for smokers, you claim that you are not trying to get underage teenage non-smokers interested in your products, yet you choose to go down this route .... why is that Ms
@Crewella ?
Is it not true that your company cannot grow or survive without attracting new vapers? ... and is it not true that the best time to hook people into becoming long term users of your product is to get them at a young age?
Is it not the case that you chose this packaging to appeal to young non-smokers that you hope to lure into a lifetime of nicotine addiction, are you any better than the tobacconists that you claim to be saving people from? Please explain to us why you chose this ridiculous childish packaging with ponies and unicorns on over a more adult theme that would surely suit your product better? Do you expect anyone to take you seriously?
EDIT: this is roleplay in case anyone doesn't get it.