Vaporshark Test Every E-Liquid They Stock – Dr F Says They Are “Severely Problematic”

[Mawsley]

MEMBERS | AEMSA .......

• Application fee: $500 due at acceptance of application (nonrefundable)
• Monthly Dues: $758
• $1500 per initial scheduled inspection

 

[the grumpy vaper]

Yeah, what can you say to that?

I'm hoping to get an interview with Gene Gillman of Enthalpy very soon.

 

[kingmoonie]

The Vaporshark Lab Testing Saga Continues – A Roundup Of The Latest News And Opinion

This is interesting reading, thanks for following it up. It seems like VS are not giving particularly straight forward answers and arnt really willing to share the real reason they have done this this way.

 

[the grumpy vaper]

This is interesting reading, thanks for following it up. It seems like VS are not giving particularly straight forward answers and arnt really willing to share the real reason they have done this this way.

Well, I have a video interview with the Ops Director of Vaporshark, Michael Harnandez this afternoon at 3.30, I'll see if I can get a bit more detail off him then.

 

[kingmoonie]

Well, I have a video interview with the Ops Director of Vaporshark, Michael Harnandez this afternoon at 3.30, I'll see if I can get a bit more detail off him then.

Great will be interesting to see what he has to say. Are you going to screen capture the conversation so we can all see it?

 

[jsixtysix]

Must Vape response, thanks to Josh:

 

[blademansw]

Well, I have a video interview with the Ops Director of Vaporshark, Michael Harnandez this afternoon at 3.30, I'll see if I can get a bit more detail off him then.

I think an ideal question would be along the lines of "Did you give the opportunity for EVERY juice manufacturer listed to comment on these results, and if so, why were their comments not published along with your test results in the interests of a fair and balanced view of the results".

And as said by others "Considering some of the extremely high results shown for some liquids shown, did you consider getting some control samples tested at other third party labs to verify the results and again provide balance"

 

[the grumpy vaper]

Great will be interesting to see what he has to say. Are you going to screen capture the conversation so we can all see it?

It'll be live on Hangouts and then a recorded version will go up on TGV later on.

 

[steffijade]

Any scientific test can be influenced by methodology and the parameters set for the test.

If there is going to be consistency, there needs to be an agreed industry standard of testing, with the same methodology/parameters applied to all testing.

This would provide a baseline for making reasoned judgement rather than allowing for cherry picking of data to produce 'required' results.

Without a uniform testing process and parameters, any results can be manipulated to suggest good/bad qualities.

We've already seen too many ANTZ studies using dodgy methodology/parameters to produce scaremongering results. If juice suppliers start manipulating methods/parameters to produce skewed data in order to try and gain a commercial advantage, we're on a very slippery slope.

 

[the grumpy vaper]