Gonloopy
Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 5,627
Ah, no, that's far more comprehensive, thank you.
That study details the nicotine concentrations used, duration, room volume, variables etc that weren't in the original link.
What looked "suspect" was a value of 34ug/m of nicotine after cigarette used, but 0 when e-cigs were used. If the study below yours is representative, you'd expect a value of ~ 3.4ug/m rather than 0.
All analysis will have a limit of determination (LOD,) that is the lower limit that either the instrumentation, the sample collection methods, or usually both can work to usually based upon how repeatable results are by RSD.
I don't have time to go through the whole article (nor do I want to having worked on analysis methods all week!) but it looks as if all the parameters are specified.
Thanks for the link, I will have a read through at leisure next week
My apologies, I probably threw you off by not linking the source article. Schoolgirl error
I have to critically appraise a lot of research trials for my work, - in terms of trial structure , validity in the real world etc, but I don't crunch the numbers.
Would be interested to here your thoughts if you get round to it next week.