E-cigarettes: is vaping any safer than old-fashioned smoke? (The Guardian)

[knome]

Thorough but prejudiced article written by a stereotypical, metropolitan, designer stubble guy (I'm a sucker for first impressions)...

E-cigarettes: is vaping any safer than old-fashioned smoke? | Society | The Guardian

 

[cheersm8]

Well, I waded through the article, and I have as much respect for it's content as any of my posts here on POTV, which is about zero seeing as a mostly post bollox.
The opinions of an unscientifically qualified journalist quoting stuff that other people have told him are worthless, although I do respect his job, after all, he is paid to quote what other folks have told him, that's journalism.


ps. when did coffee made with hot milk become latte?

 

[Mawsley]

Thorough but prejudiced article written by a stereotypical, metropolitan, designer stubble guy (I'm a sucker for first impressions)...

E-cigarettes: is vaping any safer than old-fashioned smoke? | Society | The Guardian

I enjoyed it, but then I do cultivate stubble.

 

[Diche]

I didn't think it was a bad article, maybe not pro vaping, but I would struggle to define it as anti vaping. A study of a counterculture

 

[knome]

ps. when did coffee made with hot milk become latte?

About the same time somebody decided to take away the working man's (or woman's) pub and fags.

 

[knome]

I didn't think it was a bad article, maybe not pro vaping, but I would struggle to define it as anti vaping. A study of a counterculture

You're right. I re-read it and it's not too bad. Initially, I read it with my anti-Guardian-snob-first-impression control on a low setting.

 

[schlinky]

On the whole not bad at all in my book considering the current state of affairs. Click bait headline which is kind of answered, buried in what is a very long article. Would have benefited from some quotes of proper studies but interesting mention of the BT warnings on their own products being fearmongering.

Pretty good for the Guardian.