What's new

In talking down AZ's success, the EU has sacrificed lives for the integrity of the European Project

Mitz

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 24, 2017
Messages
16,107
In talking down AstraZeneca's success, the EU has sacrificed lives for the integrity of the European Project

Vaccine uptake in the EU is only poor because their leaders spread misinformation about the jabs


As the EU and its larger member states have just amply demonstrated, there is no problem that cannot be made worse through pig-headed leadership. Last month, when it became clear that Covid vaccines were being rolled out in Britain much faster than across the EU, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen blamed AstraZeneca for not delivering enough shots, and threatened legal action – as well as potentially blocking all vaccine exports from the EU, thereby punishing Britain as well as AstraZeneca.

How is it going now? AstraZeneca has upped production, delivered more doses and announced that it will construct a new factory in Germany to roll out the drug faster. Yet the gap between vaccination in the EU and in Britain grows ever-wider. In Britain, 23.9 per cent of the population has now received at least one dose, with the government achieving its target of offering the vaccine to all over-70s and the most-vulnerable younger groups by the middle of February. And in the EU? Just 3.2 per cent of the population has received a jab. In France and Germany it is 3.4 per cent, and in Slovakia – which is now the furthest-ahead of all EU countries – it is 4.4 per cent.

The problem now, though, is not just the much-criticised EU vaccines procurement programme – although that remains a huge issue. Vaccination-rollout has been hampered by foolish efforts by EU leaders to undermine public faith in the AstraZeneca vaccine. The German magazine Spiegel reported this week figures from Germany’s Robert Koch Institute which show that of 736,000 doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine delivered to Germany, just 64,869 have actually been used. Why so few? People have not been turning up at their vaccination appointments. In France, too, people refusing the vaccine; a website for healthcare workers to book a vaccination this week was reported to have hundreds of slots going begging, while staff at one hospital in Perigueux had written an open letter asking to be given the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines rather than the AstraZeneca one.

This is hardly surprising given their leaders’ efforts to trash the AstraZeneca product. The German government’s vaccine committee pointedly declined to allow the AstraZeneca vaccine to be administered to the over-65s on the grounds that there was not enough data on the efficacy of this group (although the European Medicines Agency has granted it a licence to be used in all ages). In France, President Macron, citing no evidence at all, declared the AstraZeneca vaccine to be ‘quasi ineffective’ in the over-65s.

False claims now abound in France and Germany that the AstraZeneca vaccine has awful side-effects beyond those reported in the trials – something which has been debunked by Germany’s Paul Ehrlich Institute, which has been analysing the rollout of all vaccines. It is true that trial data – as well as real-world evidence – suggests that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are more efficacious than the AstraZeneca one. But the same data show that all three vaccines are very effective, and well above the 50 per cent threshold that regulators considered would make them worthy of approval. Moreover, when you have a raging epidemic, the priority is surely to get as many people vaccinated as soon as possible, not to fuss that one might be a few per cent more efficacious than another.

It wasn’t so long ago that Trump’s White House was seen by many as leading to way in pumping out misinformation on the Covid pandemic, threatening public health in the process. That torch has well and truly been handed to the Elysee Palace.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...as-success-eu-has-sacrificed-lives-integrity/
 
I was intending to get the Vaccine, but looking at recent data, I think I might take my chances with the Virus !!!
Screenshot (4).png
 
I was intending to get the Vaccine, but looking at recent data, I think I might take my chances with the Virus !!!
View attachment 240405
Hazz - firstly, I am not digging at you at all fella , just pointing out - that website is an American Anti-vaccine site .... I don’t think you can trust those numbers. I doubt very much it’s legitimate “recent data”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children's_Health_Defense

Children's Health Defense is an American 501c3nonprofit advocacy organization,[1] known for its anti-vaccine activism. Much of the material put forth by the organization involves misinformation on vaccines and anti-vaccine propaganda.

@Leni
 
Last edited:
I was intending to get the Vaccine, but looking at recent data, I think I might take my chances with the Virus !!!
View attachment 240405

The UK government are releasing the data for vaccine adverse reactions obtained from the yellow card scheme
https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...bq-3oECT-Wou-6GX3xAbB19NMbsyLeGXpky15GIgPhNWQ

Pfizer /bioNTech data here:
https://assets.publishing.service.g...A_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf

Astrazeneca here:
https://assets.publishing.service.g...VID-19_AstraZeneca_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf
 
What does that data mean? The sentence ‘Found 9845 cases where Vaccine is Covid 19’ doesn’t make any sense, what is it suggesting? :hmm:
I think it's a site for reporting adverse reactions to any vaccine so it's saying those cases are from reports when the side effect is the result of a vaccine for Covid-19.

But those numbers on their own are pretty meaningless. Many people will experience issues that are totally unconnected to their vaccine and wrongly presuming that they are connected they will be reported. Without additional data to back up whether or not reported issues (especially the serious ones) are actually caused by the vaccine then it's just a bunch of numbers. Someone can be vaccinated and then die 48hrs later. Doesn't mean the death is caused by the vaccine. Also doesn't stop it being reported. Looking at their site anybody can report an adverse reaction. How many are authentic and actually caused by a vaccine is anyone's guess. And can the numbers be trusted? Is there any malicious reporting? I don't know but personally I wouldn't trust an anti-vax organisation like that to choose the colour of my underwear. Would need a lot more additional data from a reputable source to mean anything. IMHO, of course. Other's MMV.
 
Last edited:
“Foaming at the mouth, massive heart attack to did not recover”

stunning

If we had any more than simple mild reactions to the vaccine in the U.K. the sun would be all over it like a rash
 
The information from the U.K. Yellow Card scheme is interesting to read. I’m glad I didn’t see any of that before I had the jab, I don’t think it’s wise to scare yourself out of having it. I had a really sore arm and aching joints for a few days, but I wasn’t well anyway so apart from the sore arm, I don’t know what was a result of the vaccine, and what was other things.
 
The information from the U.K. Yellow Card scheme is interesting to read. I’m glad I didn’t see any of that before I had the jab, I don’t think it’s wise to scare yourself out of having it. I had a really sore arm and aching joints for a few days, but I wasn’t well anyway so apart from the sore arm, I don’t know what was a result of the vaccine, and what was other things.
You only have to read the info slip that comes with a paracetamol or ibuprofen packet to see that horrific side effects, however rare, are experienced by the very unlucky few with meds taken routinely around the world for things as simple as a headache without so much as a second thought. Doesn't stop people taking paracetamol when they are in pain because the odds of a severe reaction are so incredibly small. Statistically, serious side effects are rare and with most vaccines the benefits heavily outweigh the risks.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom