What's new

smoking stalled

Introduced as “a GP and medical director at the [CHRE]”, she made no mention of the links to Philip Morris as she discussed the increase in smoking rates during the pandemic and encouraged listeners to quit smoking, including through the use of e-cigarettes or other “safer nicotine” products including patches and gum.

In a statement, she said CHRE offered advice on all smoking cessation products, not just e-cigarettes, and this was consistent with “recommendations by UK’s national health bodies”. She said she always declared relevant interests when giving talks.

Calls for change
Dr Vinayak Prasad, head of the World Health Organisation’s No Tobacco Unit, said: “The tobacco industry is constantly using front groups and allies to change the perception of their deadly products and influence health policies.”

The organisation has launched a new “Stop the lies” campaign to highlight tobacco companies attempts to influence health policy, in contravention of a global tobacco control treaty. New research by the WHO has found that globally a higher proportion of children aged 13 to 15 had tried vapes than among adults.

Mark Hurley, a spokesman for the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said: “Tobacco companies like Philip Morris and British American Tobacco have a long history of funding front groups to manipulate the public and advance their business interests at the expense of public health. Tobacco companies have funded ‘research’ that claimed the science was still out on the health impacts of smoking … it’s shameful that tobacco companies still think they can get away with it.

“Groups like the Philip Morris-funded Foundation for a Smoke-Free World are used to undermine life-saving public health laws around the world and to enable tobacco companies to insert themselves into public health policy. Far from being part of the solution, tobacco companies like British American Tobacco and Philip Morris are the main cause of the global tobacco epidemic that kills millions of people each year — full stop. If an organisation or research is being funded by a tobacco company, you can trust one thing only: that the aim is to further the interests of a deadly industry.”

Dr Raouf Alebshehy, managing editor of Tobacco Tactics at the University of Bath, said: “These incidents [are] the latest examples of the industry’s long history of using third parties and front groups, funding and publishing its own research, and attempting to manipulate science.”

He argued that “these tactics also blatantly contravene the tobacco control treaty, which explicitly requires governments to protect public health from the commercial interests of the industry”.

Deborah Arnott, chief executive of the anti-smoking charity Action on Smoking and Health (ASH). said the “activities exposed by the Times are textbook tobacco industry attempts to influence public policy which failed before and will again”.

Sheila Duffy, chief executive of ASH Scotland, said: “Astroturf campaigning, which is hard to spot, is increasingly being used by the tobacco industry and its allies to create and amplify false perceptions of grassroots opinion being against proposed progressive health measures.

“Tobacco industry funding for campaigns helps to create a massive imbalance in the volume of government consultation responses that can be generated to drown out genuine community voices and health advocates’ concerns about the impacts imposed by their health-harming, addictive products on society.” She said these campaigns can “dangerously distort public health debates and delay or disrupt regulations to protect the profits of health-harming corporations”.

Wes Streeting, Labour’s shadow health secretary, said: “Having ruined countless lives through smoking, Big Tobacco now looks to be using the same old playbook and getting a new generation of kids hooked on nicotine through vapes.” He called on Rishi Sunak to “start taking tough action to protect children’s health”.

Mark Hurley, a spokesman for the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said: “Tobacco companies like Philip Morris and British American Tobacco have a long history of funding front groups to manipulate the public and advance their business interests at the expense of public health. Tobacco companies have funded ‘research’ that claimed the science was still out on the health impacts of smoking, among other ludicrous findings over the years. After decades of recycling this tactic, it’s shameful that tobacco companies still think they can get away with it.

“Groups like the Philip Morris-funded Foundation for a Smoke-Free World are used to undermine life-saving public health laws around the world and to enable tobacco companies to insert themselves into public health policy. Far from being part of the solution, tobacco companies like British American Tobacco and Philip Morris are the main cause of the global tobacco epidemic that kills millions of people each year — full stop. If an organisation or research is being funded by a tobacco company, you can trust one thing only: that the aim is to further the interests of a deadly industry.”

If you would like to get in touch with the reporting team behind this investigation, email [email protected]
 
FFS, starts off with the usual moral panic youth vaping "epidemic"...

Overall, the article gives the impression that it is trying to sling mud.. and make it stick...
.. and I know for a fact that many of the organisations mentioned (e.g. the New Nicotine Alliance) do good advocacy for tobacco harm reduction, irrespective of whatever tenuous link they may have to Big Tobacco...
Its [NNA] submission in June 2023 said it was a “conspiracy theory that just because there are a variety of flavoured e-liquids available, it is proof of marketing to children”...
It's more than a conspiracy theory.. it's complete BS...
 
OK, maybe not a good look... but what is wrong in principle with the World Vapers Alliance being funded by Big Tobacco?

because they are known to be very corrupt and have loads of money and power. they will influence the direction of the industry towards what they want it to be, which will be some kind of huge money spinner and probably not what we would rather it be.
 
Ffs, just saw Knome already posted an alternative link. :18:


There's another article if anyone's interested?

Tobacco giants linked to attacks on World Health Organisation
Industry has helped fund pro-vaping scientific research and hospitality for MPs
 
because they are known to be very corrupt and have loads of money and power. they will influence the direction of the industry towards what they want it to be, which will be some kind of huge money spinner and probably not what we would rather it be.
Yes, but I think it's good if they want (and are) influencing a direction to a more favourable position of tobacco harm reduction in general...
.. but at the same time I don't like their position at all in the way they want to dominate & monopolise the market...
 
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...-health-organisation-lr93w58cz#main-container
friday december 15 2023

INVESTIGATION
Tobacco giants linked to attacks on World Health Organisation

Industry has helped fund pro-vaping scientific research and hospitality for MPs
%2Fmethode%2Ftimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2F30b867a8-4c55-4564-9446-7577c79066ef.jpg


Billy Kenber
, Senior Investigations Reporter
Friday December 15 2023, 5.00pm, The Times

Tobacco giants have links to vaping groups running online campaigns attacking the World Health Organisation (WHO), and have helped fund hospitality and travel for MPs who have been supportive in Westminster, a Times investigation reveals.

This comes as big players in the tobacco industry were found to be bankrolling efforts to boost e-cigarette sales and thwart proposed restrictions on flavours, prices and disposable vapes designed to protect young people.

The tobacco industry has funded scientific papers and campaign groups that have played down the risks to children from vaping. It was also revealed that hundreds of British doctors have received pro-vaping smoking cessation sessions from a NHS doctor whose company has received millions from a Philip Morris International-funded entity.


Responding to the investigation, Victoria Atkins, the health secretary, said that she “won’t be swayed by Big Tobacco”.


“This government will create a smoke-free generation and work to clamp down on vaping amongst children,” she wrote on Twitter/X.

Andrew Griffith, the Science minister, told Times Radio that protecting children from vaping risks is “absolutely paramount” and Rishi Sunak has shown “he’s not afraid to stand up to tobacco”.

Griffith said: “This government is happy to stand up to any vested interests. The thing that should drive this is the health of our young people, protecting them from harm, and that should be the overriding concern at all points.”

%2Fmethode%2Ftimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2F115fb1b2-b5d6-4173-a09c-ef3cfed4ce61.jpg

Adverts on social media urge users to “say no to the WHO” over vaping stance
ROBERTO PFEIL/DPA/ALAMY
Groups with links to cigarette makers are also targeting the WHO, it can be revealed. The WHO opposes the use of e-cigarettes, arguing that they are harmful to health and unproven as a tool for giving up smoking.



It also oversees an international treaty aimed at blocking tobacco industry interference in health policymaking.

Industry-linked pressure groups have spent hundreds of thousands of pounds on online adverts to encourage Facebook users to lobby their MPs against proposed vaping restrictions and to join an anti-WHO campaign focused on a key treaty policy meeting taking place in Panama early next year.

Adverts on social media urge users to “say no to the WHO” and warn that “British lawmakers must stand up to the WHO, or we risk losing control of our country”.

%2Fmethode%2Ftimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2Ff0b476f0-c381-428e-9ccc-567987b1e471.jpg

Adam Afriyie, the MP for Windsor, has argued that vaping was less harmful for young people than social media
ALAMY
[paste:font size="4"]The MPs for vaping

The treaty, which has been criticised by leading tobacco firms including Philip Morris International, severely limits interactions between tobacco companies and policymakers
 
However cigarette makers have been able to foster links with a small group of supportive politicians who are willing to work with organisations connected to tobacco companies. They were members of the all-party parliamentary group (APPG) on vaping which was set up in 2014 and closed down three weeks ago.

Two of the MPs who sat on the APPG have benefited from corporate hospitality or other trips paid for with tobacco money.

In September Adam Afriyie, the MP for Windsor, took to the stage in Seoul, South Korea before a roomful of e-cigarette and tobacco industry delegates to declare his support for pro-vaping health policies.

He said: “The inappropriate application of the precautionary principle — which many other nations are trying to enact — is sacrificing lives on the altar of virtue signalling.”

Afriyie said the key “question we have to ask as policymakers is what is the relative risk of people indulging in vaping as opposed to something else”. He argued that vaping was less harmful for young people than social media.

“It’s clearly less damaging if one of my children should start to vape than if they were to start to smoke, take heroin or become overly addicted to social media, which is incredibly damaging.”

Afriyie had received flights, food and accommodation worth more than £8,400 from the organisers of the Global Tobacco and Nicotine Forum (GTNF) to attend the event.



It followed another trip to the event in Washington DC in September 2022 which had cost GTNF more than £10,000, according to his register of interests. GTNF’s sponsors include all of the large tobacco companies.

The MP, whose wife is a shareholder in a firm that sells disposable vapes, has proved a reliable supporter of pro-vaping policies. Last year he spoke at a vaping conference held by the UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA) and praised how the industry was part of the “vanguard of public health”.

“You’re part of healthcare now and you are doing a virtuous thing by helping to save lives and reduce harm,” he told delegates.

In a statement, Afriyie said he was “proud of the UK’s progress in harm reduction and as a former vice chair of the APPG on vaping I was always pleased to accept speaking invitations and to share our UK success story”.


He said vaping saved lives and he was on a crusade to “ensure that legislation is evidence-based and led by the science”.

Another former APPG member, the Tory MP Mark Pawsey, who was chairman, previously accepted hospitality worth £1,650 from tobacco company Japan Tobacco International (JTI) to attend an England-Australia rugby match at Twickenham in 2015.

He was listed to speak at the World Vape Forum in Dubai last year on a panel on “vaping research and public health”.

ADVERTISEMENT

The six-man panel was to be moderated by the head of the UK vaping industry trade body and included executives from British American Tobacco and Philip Morris International.

Mark Pawsey MP has accepted hospitality and hosted eventsMark Pawsey MP has accepted hospitality and hosted events
Mark Pawsey MP has accepted hospitality and hosted events
Pawsey said he “held discussions about possibly joining the Vape Show last year virtually and online, but in the event was unable to do so”. JTI said none of its “hospitality is given to elicit a specific outcome, and politicians will judge for themselves the merits of our views”.

The MP also hosted events for the UKVIA, which allowed tobacco companies to be members until changing its policy in September this year.

A third MP, Labour’s Mary Glindon, spoke at another event organised by GTNF and has also attended UKVIA events. Glindon has said during a parliamentary debate that “given my interest in smoking cessation, I have worked with tobacco companies such as British American Tobacco UK and Japan Tobacco International as well as the [UKVIA]”.

She said all these organisations were “united in their efforts to make vaping products as safe as possible through regulation and to help prevent young people taking up vaping”.

Glindon said she was an “earnest advocate for smokers who find it hard to give up smoking, to change to vaping” and she hadn’t been paid to speak at the GTNF forum. She said she saw no conflict of interest in working with tobacco companies “who seriously recognise the importance of the vaping market to help existing smokers change to vaping”.

The APPG they were members of has been sponsored, at different times, by a lobbying group which was working for Japan Tobacco International, an industry trade body and by the UKVIA.

It published several pro-vaping reports and invited vaping pressure groups with links to tobacco companies to give evidence. Members have spoken of the benefits of e-cigarettes in parliamentary debate.

Pawsey said he was involved in setting up the APPG “after I saw first-hand in my constituency the efficacy of vaping devices in helping smokers to quit tobacco” and was interested in vaping “solely from a harm reduction perspective”.

He said the group was “always open to hearing from, and robustly challenging, those businesses and organisations involved in the vaping industry”.

In 2018 it called for vaping to be permitted in workplaces, while a more recent report which heard evidence from tobacco companies called for nicotine limits to be raised and the abolition of maximum bottle and tank sizes. It has also joined tobacco manufacturers in criticising the WHO.

Dr Christian Jessen, Lord Cathcart, Scott Mann MP, and Mark Pawsey MPDr Christian Jessen, Lord Cathcart, Scott Mann MP, and Mark Pawsey MP
Dr Christian Jessen, Lord Cathcart, Scott Mann MP, and Mark Pawsey MP
GUY BELL/ALAMY
In 2021, it published a report ahead of the ninth tobacco control conference taking place that year which called for the UK to send consumers as delegates and to consider withdrawing its funding for the WHO if it didn’t change its position on vaping.

Those invited to make submissions to inform the report included tobacco company JTI and several US pressure groups including the Consumer Choice Center which set up a “grassroots” organisation funded by British American Tobacco. Glindon said she was concerned about the WHO’s criticism of vaping “and the message it sends to the many smokers in this country who could benefit from switching to vaping”.

GTNF said it had invited MPs to speak at its conferences “to share their insights on the country’s tobacco harm reduction strategy and a smokefree future, as have other politicians from around the world”.

It said it was “an open and inclusive forum welcoming all perspectives in the hope of sparking the exchange of ideas and conversations on issues important to tobacco harm reduction”.

The UKVIA said it had always been transparent in its work with the APPG for vaping which it said had explored “the most appropriate parliamentary and regulatory response to e-cigarettes and to raise education and literacy amongst policy makers regarding vapes and related public policy questions”.

Two peers also have links with tobacco companies’ interest in e-cigarettes and other so-called “reduced risk” products.

Baroness Brady, who sits as a Conservative peer, has declared employment as a consultant for Philip Morris on its “commercial and business strategy to deliver a smoke-free future”, while Lord Wharton of Yarm previously carried out “strategic and management advice” for the Consumer Choice Center which runs the World Vapers’ Alliance and has taken funding from British American Tobacco and other tobacco companies. The Consumer Choice Center said it had a “Chinese wall between fundraising and editorial decisions”.




Targeting the World Health Organisation
Campaign groups with links to the tobacco industry have stepped up efforts to pressure the WHO ahead of the forthcoming tenth meeting which is being held in Panama in February.

A group called “Say No to WHO” has spent more than £155,000 on Facebook adverts shown to millions of users. It is currently running adverts depicting the Houses of Parliament as “WHO-controlled property” and claims “British lawmakers must stand up to the World Health Organisation, or we risk losing control of our country”.

The group was set up by Global Britain, a think tank run by a former pro-smoking campaigner who worked in the 1990s for a group funded by the tobacco industry. It has not disclosed its source of funding.

The same think tank runs another group, Save My Vape, which has spent a further £150,000 on Facebook ads including recent adverts urging users to write to their MP to lobby for them to “protect access” to e-cigarettes. Others ads call on vapers to “protect your choice to vape in the UK”.

Another group, We Vape UK, runs a “Back Vaping Save Lives” campaign and has set out its objectives for the upcoming Cop10 meeting (conference of the parties to the WHO framework on tobacco control) which include calling for the “government to back vaping on an international stage and protect the NHS’s pro vaping stance against outside influence.”

It also wants the government to “send consumers to represent the UK” as part of its delegation.

We Vape UK was set up by a fellow at the Adam Smith Institute, a think tank which has previously taken tobacco funding. They didn’t respond to a request for comment.

The WHO has been attacked by a number of tobacco companies over its anti-vaping stance and the way in which its tobacco control treaty has been used to curb their involvement in health initiatives.

In 2017, Reuters obtained documents from Philip Morris which revealed details of its campaign to subvert the treaty, including running covert operations rooms in the cities holding meetings and secretly meeting with delegates from member nations.

Internal documents denounced the treaty as driven by “anti-tobacco extremists” and executives took credit for watering down anti-smoking proposals.

Tobacco industry delegates are banned from the meetings and restrictions have been placed on media access after pro-industry figures previously used media credentials to get in. Critics have said that the call for consumers to be represented is another attempt to bypass restrictions on tobacco industry involvement.

The WHO, which this week urged governments to take “decisive action” on e-cigarettes and ban all flavours, has previously warned that some member countries “have been approached by the tobacco and other industry representatives, to offer travel and technical support, including advisors, for their official delegations”. It reminded participants “that there is a fundamental and irreconcilable conflict between the tobacco industry’s interests and public health policy interests”.


Morris said the WHO had previously encouraged tobacco companies to pursue a harm reduction strategy but “appears to have buckled to pressure from billionaire-funded special interest groups and changed its path to prevent the true public health potential of these innovations from being realised”.

It also said it is “clear that the best option is to never start
smoking and for smokers to quit altogether, but the reality is most don’t quit” and so it was important to offer less harmful ways to consume nicotine. The NHS doctor who received money from a foundation which has been solely funded by Philip Morris said she was confident that that foundation was independent.

She said she offered advice on all smoking cessation products, not just e-cigarettes, that this was consistent with NHS recommendations and that she always declared relevant interests.
 
Yes, but I think it's good if they want (and are) influencing a direction to a more favourable position of tobacco harm reduction in general...

this has happened in spite of, not because of, the tobacco industry. they are only doing this because they know tobacco is on it’s road out and they are trying to set themselves up with something else addictive to monopolise. so imo it is not good.
 
Back
Top Bottom