What's new

The Future of Nicotine Addiction: When Smokers Become Vapers

K

KulrMeStoopid

Guest
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brent-green/electronic-cigarettes_b_2918405.html

The nation's tobacco industry is facing one monumental impediment to future growth: a shrinking (and dying) customer base of cigarette smokers.


Business 101 suggests three strategies to strengthen future sales and profits. First, redefine the core business; in this case, shift from relying on tobacco and expand into a broader nicotine business. Second, acquire start-up companies developing leading-edge technologies that deliver nicotine in novel ways. And third, bring in new customers who will sustain the core business into the future.


In 2007, the seeds of these strategies were planted in the U.S. -- not in tobacco fields but in high-tech labs. That season's robust harvest featured electronic cigarettes, also called e-cigarettes or e-cigs. And the potentially addictive consumer habit propelling this market's growth is calledvaping.


Vaping is vernacular for "smoking" electronic cigarettes, a technology invented allegedly by a pharmacist in China that allows nicotine to be atomized and delivered through electrically powered pseudo-cigarettes. E-cigs produce no odor, and what appears to be smoke is actually vapor, thus "vaping." Street argot for this 21st century technology includes "eGo," "tailpiping," "juice carto," "throat hit," and "dripping."


On the one hand, electronic cigarettes can be construed as a blessing. E-cig smokers receive atomized nicotine mixed with compelling flavors called "smoke juice." Imbibers don't inhale roughly 70 known carcinogens associated with burning tobacco products. Their exhalations purportedly don't disseminate harmful second-hand smoke.


Vaping provides an alternative habit for long-term cigarette smokers, helping reduce some of their risks for developing lung and heart diseases. Potential public health benefits are noteworthy and persuasive.


On the other hand, this new nicotine-delivery technology has foreboding implications, especially when coupled with sophisticated marketing techniques promoting vaping behavior via traditional media and online.


First introduced in Europe in 2006 and then in the U.S. in 2007, e-cigarettes heralded a significant alternative to traditional cigarettes, buttressed by claims that e-cigs reduce carcinogens and other toxicants to below harmful levels. The sales potential did not go unnoticed by the tobacco industry.


In April 2012, Lorillard, Inc., the third largest cigarette manufacturer in the U.S., purchased one of the niche brands called blu Ecigs for $135 million. And that's when the marketing game really changed. This was a watershed moment in the short timeline of e-cigs.


Manufacturer and marketer of stalwart cigarette brands such as Kent, Newport and True, Lorillard has amassed the resources and marketing sophistication that consumers associate with classic cigarette advertisers. And they're applying these assets to their newest acquisition, blu.


Tobacco companies dominated advertising share-of-voice on television in 1969. But just before midnight on December 31, 1970, American television viewers witnessed the final national ad supporting nicotine-based, smoke-able products on The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson. Nevertheless, in the fall of 2012, blu rolled out nationally with a black & white television spot featuring actor Stephen Dorff.


Known for his film roles such as the evil vampire Deacon Frost in the superhero horror movieBlade, Dorff addresses television and online viewers with macho self-confidence as he defies forces that have limited his twenty-year smoking habit. Dorff pronounces, "We're all adults here. It's time we take our freedom back. Come on guys, rise from the ashes."
<center><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VZishwAt_RM?rel=0" frameborder="0"></iframe></center>Through Dorff's forthright declarations, viewers might perceive other contextual messages. Bluseems to be appealing to iconoclastic young men since men tend to take up smoking in larger proportions than women. Vaping can be also about asserting independence, even defiance of conventional social standards, much like the movie and TV characters portrayed by Steve McQueen, the late Hollywood icon who promoted Viceroy cigarettes.


Lorillard may be resurrecting classic tobacco branding techniques by associating its blu brand with macho self-reliance and anti-authoritarianism, the DNA of emerging manhood, similar to some of the emotional triggers that so successfully hooked adult males on cigarettes in the 1950s through the 1970s.


Considering over 60 years of tobacco marketing history, especially tactics popular during the 1950s and 1960s, it seems reasonable now to wonder if the e-cig marketing focus might shift from current cigarette smokers to prospective vapers, from nicotine retention to trial, and from middle-age users to young adults, even teens. E-cig marketers appear to be embracing all the subliminal and obvious consumer associations between their new products and tobacco cigarettes -- except unsavory association with cigarette smoking (as in producing carcinogenic smoke, second-hand smoke, anti-smoking).


Although industry proxies profess that their e-cig marketing targets only the 45 million active adult smokers through mass media advertising, marketers also know that two principles govern ad delivery in mass media. The target may indeed be adult smokers and ads have indeed been placed with age-appropriate programming; however, the broad reach of television and other mass media inevitably has significant spillover to nonsmokers and even teens under 18.


NJOY King, an aggressive competitor to blu, ran a national television ad during the 2013 Academy Awards, reaching a potential cumulative viewing audience of 42.40 million, most certainly including significant numbers of pre-teen and teen viewers. In this television spot, a vigorous, unshaven man appears to smoke a traditional cigarette, from ash tip to filter. He exhales smoke with an expression of sublime pleasure. The pack looks like the real deal. The background sound bed comes from Foreigner's 1977 debut song, "Feels Like the First Time." (One can only wonder how many teen viewers considered an e-cig for the very first time.)
 
Hmmmm here, too.
So nobody's saying 'no' to airing these ads? Given that the FDA jury's pretty much still out (not for long, I suspect, however) on whether vaping is 'safe', and vaping is not 'smoking', Big Tobacco and Big Pharma can do all they can to protect their interests. Extracting nicotine from tobacco - or synthesising it - can still happen for a profit. Production and product may change, but I can't blame them for trying.
Infomercials aired in the dead of night happen here, too, apparently. I had to chuckle a bit at the new Courtney Love ad which I saw on AFV today - not for Blu, though, I don't .

I've never been a fan of Big Tobacco, nor Pharma, but I have a really big problem with the recent legislation here in Australia regarding packaging and display.
For one thing, the packaging is hardly 'plain'! Ghastly images of smoking-related conditions etc etc taking up 50% of the front of the packaging, while the remainder is completely generic, eliminating all branding is all that remains of tobacco product presentation. All tobacco products are covered up, and there is no longer any information regarding the tar levels between strengths and brands.
I don't believe for a second that any of this assists with smoking cessation or not starting at all. I'm also a small retailer of tobacco products (corner shop), so all of this is also a massive pain in the arse in terms of compliance. It's a lot of extra work for no return, on a very low-margin product line. Fines are huge and draconian. Government organises 'secret shoppers' to catch retailers out for selling to minors. I won't sell to them anyway, but if I did, without checking for proof of age (18+) we'd be out of business with a huge debt to service, just to pay the fine!
We've even had to upgrade our security and surveillance (which we can't afford) due to abuse and threats from those of dicey looks, age-wise, but no ID to substantiate the legitimacy of their requests for tobacco products/paraphernalia. The worst incident was over fag papers, FFS! We've adopted an no-exception policy to keep things simple. But I have to say, sales aren't affected by it at all. Fat lot of good it's done so far.

So, I don't really blame Big Tobacco for looking to other means of doing what they do. I don't necessarily agree with it all, but I know for sure that if governments had the power to completely negate branding that's been very costly to establish over the decades and actively limit MY means of conducting LEGAL business, what choice would I have??
 
I just dont understand why the government cant figure out that kids dont start smoking because of packaging or advertisements, its either by example or peer pressure In all my life I have never met a smoker who tells me "I was bored one day and saw the cigs bright blue coloured box and thought "Hey want not get myself addicted to these today!?"
 
Yerrsss..:eyeroll:
It also speaks a little bit to those in the certified/accredited 'quit' organisations, and their take on vaping - in Aus, anyway.
It would seem that much of their funding comes from the NRT producers - I only assume this because they promote them quite actively - and their position on vaping is neutral (I'm being generous LOL) at best. Very interesting to see the interaction, actually.
For example:
http://www.icanquit.com.au/story/1713/i-quit-using-e-cigarettes-you-can-too

I seriously think these orgs are going to have to radically change their position if they're going to be of any help whatsoever. Putting themselves between rocks and hard places for the sake of funding will be harder and harder to do. Then again the responsibility for said funding may also change. If fewer people smoke, the taxes will decrease, yet the cost of treatment for smoking-related illnesses/conditions will be ongoing for generations yet.

To me, the question will be whether governments concede that they have to get the tax dollars from vapers AND smokers, or say 'buggerit', and outlaw vaping. Either way I don't see us enjoying our relatively cheaper, and (IMO) healthier alternative as freely as we do now.

Sorry - I'm all over the place with this, but it's really hard to keep it on one track, with so many other issues relating to Big Tobacco.
 
Luckily for us ASH, has a pretty positive outlook on Ecigs and is surprisingly supportive!
 
Seems Ash Australia is still pretty uninformed here. Apparently ecigs are not legal here LMAO

http://www.ashaust.org.au/lv3/Lv3resources_factsinfo.htm

Then again the TGA (Therapeutic Goods Authority) claims that ecigs are indeed illegal. I think someone died and made them god. And god has missed the point that it is not illegal to use or sell or buy ecigs in Australia. Nicotine, on the other hand, is illegal, but that's ok because it's legal to buy, use and sell cigarettes.
http://www.tga.gov.au/consumers/ecigarettes.htm#what
 
Interesting article and i think it sums up the whole feeling of confusion that seems to follow vaping. I have to say on a lighter note, that I am confused by the term "tail piping". Not heard that one before and it reeks of being a planted idea from the enemy (not sure which one though). Why the hell would any of us nickname our habit/hobby after a major pollutant! Strange world we live in! On the subject of the effect of packaging, I can't say I've noticed the queue in tesco get any smaller since they installed the shutter blinds. What were they thinking!
 
"We're all adults here. It's time we take our freedom back. Come on guys, rise from the ashes."

classic.
 
I actually got to "educate" my oldest the other day in Morrisons about the shutters. And he proclaimed pretty loudly, "Well, Thats Stupid!"
 
Back
Top Bottom