I am waiting on a reply from the MHRA about the missing CAS numbers as I want clarification on the situation should flavour companies be not willing to supply them. Unfortunately the whole juice industry is akin to a headless chicken at the moment trying to get every duck in a row that few of us have even time to talk with each other like we did just a few months ago. Ideally the MHRA will allow supply of flavouring and supplier names should the CAS option be a total roadblock from the supplier side of things.
As far as I can tell, the MHRA have actually used a pretty light touch when it comes to transposing the legislation to UK law but even so there are a few sections of the EU TPD that cannot realistically be interpreted loosely (which is how they have managed to be lighter than other countries) so I doubt there is much in the way of wiggle room.
For us, we have CAS numbers for a lot of the flavours we use and a full GC-MS breakdown of percentages used over 1% - for those flavours we already have the data for notification but it leaves us with chunks missing from other companies that haven't or won't supply theirs. It leaves only a couple of options:
1: reformulate the flavour using houses that are supplying CAS data - this isn't a good solution for us, in By Jove for example we use a few different Rhubarb's to create our stewed flavour and this is not able to be replicated using other flavours with available data (we have tried)
2: drop that flavour from the line, again not ideal when the likes of By Jove is one of our best sellers
3: try to find a flavour house that can replicate the flavour as a custom order - not a cheap option to add to the already mounting costs.
I know of a lot of other companies that are using lots of flavours that the CAS data is just not being offered - infact it was blankly refused by flavour houses. For a reputable business to be placed in such a tight squeeze from all angles is unacceptable and not fair in the slightest. This regulation was meant to keep a track of ingredients for safety and traceability reasons but turned into a method to close the door to many in the industry.
There is a reason that BAT and the like are being investigated by the EU commission for bribery and illegal influence relating to the TPD legislation process. Many of the lobbyists used every tactic they could to swing the legislation toward being harsh on small business as they know they have the financial power and political sway to sweep up the mess and re-invigorate their own dying business model.
Yep, you ain't wrong in anything you say
One of my ADVs from a UK juice chef had to be dropped because of the CAS intransigence.
We know you meant to say suspected or alleged "bribery and illegal influence" (bastards have deep pockets and long arms, allegedly)
The DoH Impact Assessment makes for a deeply disturbing read.