Ok he agrees that common sense is required in terms of their relative safety compared to tobacco. Her agrees that most science experts say they can save millions of lives. BUT he still says there is NO regulation at all. Wrong. He shows a clear misunderstanding of the damage that the new regulations will cause and the potential for stifling innovation, laying waste to a growing industry (save for big tobacco) nor does he address any of the concerns that current Vapers have about mg limits, tanks size, media restriction etc etc.
So some positives (including reminding us that there is no actual evidence of the gateway argument) but could do better