Mark
Legend
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- Messages
- 13,961
I think what we have to remember is, as a TV medical presenter, he has to speak in simple terms, and not confuse the matter with specifics or fine details. IMHO he gave a balanced and clear view, in a way that would at least encourage smokers to look at vaping as an alternative. It also gave the speculating anti-vaping simpletons, something to think about.
I don't disagree that his little piece had positives and was a lot better than some of the more anti TV 'experts'. However what will be lost on the public is the bigger picture caught up I'm afraid in the 'specifics or fine details' which in short could lead to a de facto ban on every current device on the market, med regs through the back door, an inability to promote (as he did ) their use, requirements for 'leak proof' devices, inadequate mg strength limits, prohibition on describing flavours, future limits on flavours etc etc. Whilst suggesting ecigs will be a good thing he clearly has no understanding that their very existence on the shelves is in jeopardy with the current proposals.
He wouldn't need to go into detail but could have said that as the TPD stands....good as they are and useful as they may be in terms of THR...they're at risk
Last edited: