Who = bs?

[FromTheDarkness]

Listerning to RockFM local Lancashire radio - Stating WHO has advised that e cigs should not be used indoors due to the toxins and nic realsed into the atmosphere.

Im guessing its taken from this: BBC News - 'Ban E-cigarette use indoors,' says WHO

Now i would like to know is this true, as a vape inside and i have a little boy....

Also if this is BS i would like to write a formal complaint to the radio station... any advise how to do this please.

 

[Miss Pepper]

How Toxic Is E-Liquid? | ECITA Blog

http://ecita.org.uk/docs/EU_Classification_of_nicotine_mixtures_acute_oral_and_dermal_toxicity.pdf


Just to keep you going.

I believe it is the press complaints you need to contact.

 

[blademansw]

Its BS, and yes that will be its source.

They are running scared of what vaping represents. Don't forget the WHO ANTZ are part of a multi-billion dollar industry. The last thing they will ever do is promote a safer alternative to smoking as their reason for existence is threatened by vaping.

They have ZERO evidence for their position which is looking more and more untenable as each day goes by, and they are rightly being called out on it.

 

[FromTheDarkness]

How can i make a formal complaint to the broadcaster ?

Found it ofcom ..

 

[FromTheDarkness]

My email:

I would like you formally complain regarding your report from the WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION. Your news implied that it was not safe to use E cigarettes indoors.


I would like to point out that E cigarettes could/ are/ and will save lives as stated BBC News - Electronic cigarettes 'could save millions of lives'


Is your Radio station wishing to imply to people that its unsafe to use e cigarettes, but it is fine to smoke indoors?
You have a morale responsibility and you are portraying a bad message, which could result in people not making the switch and people dyeing.


- In response to the WHO - who's members fund the organisation - Who are the major pharmaceutical companies. There comments are not impartial.
The WHO ANTZ are part of a multi billion dollar industry, the last thing they will do is promote a safer alternative to smoking. They have zero evidence for what they have published and are quiet rightly now being called out on this matter.


- Proof that secondary vapour is safe:
Studies - Planet of the Vapes Wiki


http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/08958378.2012.724728


How Toxic Is E-Liquid? | ECITA Blog


http://ecita.org.uk/docs/EU_Classification_of_nicotine_mixtures_acute_oral_and_dermal_toxicity.pdf


I would rather my local radio station, would prefer to not influence peoples opinions with what is nonsense scaremongering, when this could impact on peoples life or death.


Please sit on the fence and do not relay any other nonsense opinions, until our own government has come to decision regarding e cig regulations.


I will be filling a official complaint here


[email protected]


Very Disappointed in your decisions

 

[Chegs]

The ebola virus has claimed 1,500 lives,yet the WHO decided that it was okay to administer an experimental drug.The vaping devices we use could save millions of lives yet WHO have decided to ban their use as "we just don't know" This means (or should) that WHO has 2 choices,either fuck off & learn about them(plenty of scientific studies around)or they STFU and cease trying to scare-monger the introduction of draconian regulation!