VapingMikra
Postman
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2015
- Messages
- 802
I think he meant in relation to it being the other way round : i.e., why are people more accepting of the CV9 statement than VS's
Oh Ill grab my coat ;p
I think he meant in relation to it being the other way round : i.e., why are people more accepting of the CV9 statement than VS's
Sounds ever so slightly like utter bollocks from where I'm sitting.
But then 5 Pawns won't exist by the end of summer.
This^^^^^
How to fuck up your own business, sponsored by the weed smoking surfers running Five Pawns.
That's a great episode. He hits them as hard as it's possible to hit and I applaud it. Wholeheartedly. Without reservation. Loved the Game of thrones "shame" sequence.
As a separate point, however, it does raise other related questions outside of 5 Pawns, involving manufacturers and vapers themselves, to my mind. Such as:
1. This AP stuff is being used by most (all?) juice makers who offer custardy/creamy juices and in currently unknown quantities for a lot of them. Shouldn't there be an immediate ban - self imposed by the industry - on using this stuff in any quantity? I mean the guy in the podcast talks about the acceptable limit of AP being 5 parts per billion, so much as that has been smashed by 5 Pawns, it is going to be exceeded heavily by anyone adding it to their juices, no?
2. Do/should vapers bear some of the responsibility for this situation by condoning the use of AP through vaping custardy/creamy juices? We know this AP shit has risks. Why do we trust that juice makers will only add safe levels of it to juices? Shouldn't we all refuse to buy anything with any level of AP in it, so the message gets across that we won't stand for known-risk chemicals being added to our juices?