What's new

Covid19 and the great reset

4af.gif
 
In 2001 or 2002 when we voted in the patriot act, and then a few years later made it permanent, it was us signing away our freedom and privacy in exchange for the feeling of safety from terrorism.

)
Also if you look at the quarter of a century or so that preceded the patriot act there are quite a few strange coincidences that some people don't want you talking about for some reason.

So we know it's a fact that the central intelligence agency were funding osama bin laden and the mujahideen to fight off the soviet invasion of Afghanistan and that they were also funding Saddam Husseins war against Iran in the same time period. We also know that the bush family and some of their political and business allies were very close to the saudis because of their mutual interests in the oil industry and were on good terms with the Hussein regime as demonstrated when Donald Rumsfeld presented Saddam with a pair of golden spurs for his loyalty to the united states.
The Iran Iraq war was favourable for both the saudis and the Americans because it kept markets volatile and kept down the main competitors.

So when Saddam Hussein found out America were also funding the Iranian war effort through proxy by arming militias such as hezbollah to fight the Iraqis he invaded the oil fields of Kuwait as an act of retaliation against the saudis and the Americans which of course led to the first gulf war.

Hussein was never going to last long after that but they needed an excuse to get rid of him.
So fast forward to the turn of the century and you've got the neo conservative government of george bush junior coming to power and some of those neo conservatives such as Condaleeza Rice were calling for a 'New Pearl Harbour' as part of their 'Project For The New American Century' that would galvanise public opinion for the united states to intervene in sovereign states for the purpose of regime change.

So did the intelligence services ever sever those ties with osama bin laden?
Hard to find out but one thing is for sure they wouldn't have been able to invade Iraq on a blatant lie without the masses believing they were being kept safe from nasty men in caves......lol
 
Also if you look at the quarter of a century or so that preceded the patriot act there are quite a few strange coincidences that some people don't want you talking about for some reason.

So we know it's a fact that the central intelligence agency were funding osama bin laden and the mujahideen to fight off the soviet invasion of Afghanistan and that they were also funding Saddam Husseins war against Iran in the same time period. We also know that the bush family and some of their political and business allies were very close to the saudis because of their mutual interests in the oil industry and were on good terms with the Hussein regime as demonstrated when Donald Rumsfeld presented Saddam with a pair of golden spurs for his loyalty to the united states.
The Iran Iraq war was favourable for both the saudis and the Americans because it kept markets volatile and kept down the main competitors.

So when Saddam Hussein found out America were also funding the Iranian war effort through proxy by arming militias such as hezbollah to fight the Iraqis he invaded the oil fields of Kuwait as an act of retaliation against the saudis and the Americans which of course led to the first gulf war.

Hussein was never going to last long after that but they needed an excuse to get rid of him.
So fast forward to the turn of the century and you've got the neo conservative government of george bush junior coming to power and some of those neo conservatives such as Condaleeza Rice were calling for a 'New Pearl Harbour' as part of their 'Project For The New American Century' that would galvanise public opinion for the united states to intervene in sovereign states for the purpose of regime change.

So did the intelligence services ever sever those ties with osama bin laden?
Hard to find out but one thing is for sure they wouldn't have been able to invade Iraq on a blatant lie without the masses believing they were being kept safe from nasty men in caves......lol
I believe the bin laden family owned snapple, didnt they?

The reality is tho, we caused this all after ww1 (sorta) by redrawing borders ignoring popularion differences.

The other reality is the only way to solve it is to provide jobs, education, and opportunity to all these angry young men who basically live in 5th century conditions, so not surprising they have 5th century attitudes.
 
I believe the bin laden family owned snapple, didnt they?

The reality is tho, we caused this all after ww1 (sorta) by redrawing borders ignoring popularion differences.

The other reality is the only way to solve it is to provide jobs, education, and opportunity to all these angry young men who basically live in 5th century conditions, so not surprising they have 5th century attitudes.
I don't know about snapple mate so post up the info if you can be bothered.

Yes well that's true but the invading forces were after the resources not for the betterment of the lives of the people so I suppose they see religious fundamentalism and nuclear weapons as their only defence against military invasion.
 
I don't know about snapple mate so post up the info if you can be bothered.

Yes well that's true but the invading forces were after the resources not for the betterment of the lives of the people so I suppose they see religious fundamentalism and nuclear weapons as their only defence against military invasion.
I think it says they owned the distribution rights to sell snapple in saudi arabia or something. Its a huge family.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1000849911107474240

It wasnt just their resources either. In modern times, shorter wars boost the economies of countries like the us who have unlimited resources and can print unlimited amounts of money. This one just dragged out too long.
 
Last edited:
I believe the bin laden family owned snapple, didnt they?

The reality is tho, we caused this all after ww1 (sorta) by redrawing borders ignoring popularion differences.

The other reality is the only way to solve it is to provide jobs, education, and opportunity to all these angry young men who basically live in 5th century conditions, so not surprising they have 5th century attitudes.

SnapPLE - SheePLE. has to be true.
 
The World Economic Forum, globalist champion of the Great Reset, has ruffled feathers online with an “out-of-touch” tweet how Covid-19 lockdowns are “quietly improving cities” across the globe.
A video accompanying the Friday tweet by the WEF shows images of deserted streets, grounded airliners and idled factories, then notes record declines in air pollution and a drop in carbon emissions. It later shows busy, smog-choked highways and notes that “the drop won't slow climate change unless we lock in emissions cuts.”


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Lockdowns are quietly improving cities around the world. <br><br> Read more: <a href="https://t.co/LoTPj7VyGw">https://t.co/LoTPj7VyGw</a> <a href="https://t.co/EFSamua2PB">pic.twitter.com/EFSamua2PB</a></p>&mdash; World Economic Forum (@wef) <a href="">February 26, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The tone-deaf tweet – coming amid millions of Covid-19 deaths and countless lives and businesses being destroyed by lockdowns – was quickly ratioed by Twitter users. The WEF's comments and linked article about the historic quietness brought on by lockdowns leading to better detection of small earthquakes were lost on most observers, who focused instead on the group's apparent affection for a dystopian, depopulated world.

https://www.rt.com/news/516734-world-economic-forum-lockdowns/
 
The World Economic Forum, globalist champion of the Great Reset, has ruffled feathers online with an “out-of-touch” tweet how Covid-19 lockdowns are “quietly improving cities” across the globe.
A video accompanying the Friday tweet by the WEF shows images of deserted streets, grounded airliners and idled factories, then notes record declines in air pollution and a drop in carbon emissions. It later shows busy, smog-choked highways and notes that “the drop won't slow climate change unless we lock in emissions cuts.”


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Lockdowns are quietly improving cities around the world. <br><br> Read more: <a href="https://t.co/LoTPj7VyGw">https://t.co/LoTPj7VyGw</a> <a href="https://t.co/EFSamua2PB">pic.twitter.com/EFSamua2PB</a></p>&mdash; World Economic Forum (@wef) <a href="">February 26, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The tone-deaf tweet – coming amid millions of Covid-19 deaths and countless lives and businesses being destroyed by lockdowns – was quickly ratioed by Twitter users. The WEF's comments and linked article about the historic quietness brought on by lockdowns leading to better detection of small earthquakes were lost on most observers, who focused instead on the group's apparent affection for a dystopian, depopulated world.

https://www.rt.com/news/516734-world-economic-forum-lockdowns/


Er... your post is a bit unreadable. How about editing it?
And what does "quickly ratioed" mean?
 
Builder's guesswork Trigonometry?
Trigonometry at Silverstone?
Trigonometry on crack?
 
Back
Top Bottom