What's new

EU regulator: No evidence to support restriction of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine

The point is, they wouldn't have died, if they hadn't had the vaccine. It's irrelevant what else they might've died of, covid, childbirth, car crash, whatever. But it's ok, they died for the better good.
That's exactly not the point though - the causality hasn't been proven, they're just going to look into the possibility?
 
The point is, they wouldn't have died, if they hadn't had the vaccine. It's irrelevant what else they might've died of, covid, childbirth, car crash, whatever. But it's ok, they died for the better good.

Right it is irrelevant. Vaccines are not risk free, they never will be and when you are vaccinating people in these numbers people will die.

Would you take the flu jab, knowing that it's linked to the deaths of 10 or so people every year and a much lower number of people are vaccinated? ... on paper it's a far more 'dangerous' vaccine.
 
... and the vaccine kills far fewer, that's the maths, that's the risk people are prepared to take.
 
Right it is irrelevant. Vaccines are not risk free, they never will be and when you are vaccinating people in these numbers people will die.

100% safe, that is what we were/are being told...... 100% ...that's one hundred percent
 
Would you take the flu jab
No, this last winter was the first time I was offered it, I refused 4 times, because they asked me four times. I had the covid jab because my wife did and also for the better good. I'm not really into experimental drugs, or being part of a global drugs trial.
 
That's exactly not the point though - the causality hasn't been proven, they're just going to look into the possibility?

It's there already, it's called the covid jab, I'll bet that what's links them. Too many bloody coincidences, for it to be coincidental.
 
Back
Top Bottom