EU regulator: No evidence to support restriction of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine

[Simon G]

No, this last winter was the first time I was offered it, I refused 4 times, because they asked me four times. I had the covid jab because my wife did and also for the better good. I'm not really into experimental drugs, or being part of a global drugs trial.

That's your choice, I don't think anyone should be forced to take anything.

 

[Simon G]

'We need to be honest — no clinician would ever say that any vaccine is 100 per cent safe.

'The truth is that these vaccines are very good and as safe as they can be.'

 

[Crewella]

It's there already, it's called the covid jab, I'll bet that what's links them. Too many bloody coincidences, for it to be coincidental.

It might well be, or it might be they would have happened anyway. They absolutely do need to look into it.

 

[Simon G]

This is like people getting run over by buses dying of covid... same shit, different day.

 

[andipandi]

It might well be, or it might be they would have happened anyway. They absolutely do need to look into it.

Might is all very well, the hard facts are, they all had the jab and they all died from blood clots, yes?

 

[Crewella]

Might is all very well, the hard facts are, they all had the jab and they all died from blood clots, yes?

Yes, but this condition has already been linked to younger women, especially younger women on the pill. Might be one or the other, might be a combination ........... that's why they need to look?

 

[andipandi]

This is like people getting run over by buses dying of covid... same shit, different day.

No, it's not at all, that's a disgraceful thing to say. You don't purposely walk out in front of a bus (unless you're suicidal) or catch covid on purpose, but they did, go and have the jab. No jab, still alive, that's the real shit.

 

[zouzounaki]

it seems in the uk 7 deaths and 30 cases of this type of blood clots after the vaccine.

it is the case that they were saying the cases of blood clots were not connected to the vaccine, about which they do now seem to be back pedalling:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56620646

but i think this from the article is important:

“All medicines, from vaccines to paracetamol, have the potential to cause severe side effects.
The seasonal flu jab has around a one-in-a-million chance of causing the nerve disorder Guillain-Barre syndrome.
So, the real question is: Are the risks worth the benefits?
Even if the vaccine was the cause, and this is still not proven, the numbers suggest around one death in every 2.5 million people vaccinated.
However, this has to be weighed against the known threat posed by coronavirus.
If 2.5 million 60-year-old people caught coronavirus then around 50,000 would die. If they were all 40-year-olds then around 2,500 would die.
This balance of risk and benefit will continue to be assessed as more safety data comes in and as the vaccine programme moves into younger people, who are at lower risk of dying from Covid-19.”

 

[Rickster]

Who told you that? .... nothing is 100% safe.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/me...an-be-but-no-100percent-guarantee/ar-BB1aMAad

"Safe and 100% effective" ... not 100% safe and effective.

Aye you are correct, but when in the same sentence safe and 100 % effective is well misleading at best........ safe to my mind means it is not life threatening and will not kill you because it's safe

 

[Simon G]

No, it's not at all, that's a disgraceful thing to say. You don't purposely walk out in front of a bus (unless you're suicidal) or catch covid on purpose, but they did, go and have the jab. No jab, still alive, that's the real shit.

mate that's not the point I'm making...

10,000 people die in the UK every day, how many of those do you think die of cancer? ... lets be conservative and say 1,000. lets say half of those are over 50, lets say half of those have been vaccinated.

That's 250 people who have died of cancer after having the vaccine. .... in just a week. Would you say the vaccine causes cancer?