What the hell is this POKEJUICE!

[Deleted member 33278]

Its not - the pokemon juice is made by a legitimate juice company (Russian I believe) - with a marketing department that is either a: very good at making very bad decisions, b: not averse to doing whatever to see their juice sell and absolutely couldn't give a fuck or c: all of the above.

Meh.

Putin = Put in , by whom i wonder!

It all stinks like crap to me.

 

[ZT]

This is too be recommended

Meh.

Putin = Put in , by whom i wonder!

It all stinks like crap to me.

 

[Deleted member 33278]

This is too be recommended

View attachment 105059

I think it would suit you

 

[andre forest]

I have to say guys, I can see your points but would like to respectfully disagree for the following reasons:
Many adults enjoy pokemon, look at how many 18+ year olds play pokemon go - are adults not allowed to enjoy the same things as children? Why shouldn't they be marketed to? I'm 25 and I love adventure time. Yes I got the lemon grab reference, @pfvapes
Just because something could be interpreted negatively doesn't mean it is negative.
Sure, kids might see this and want it, but then it's down to the parents to do some actual parenting and prevent the kids from vaping underage. Maybe those parents who vape and have kids that like pokemon would enjoy these liquids, as they get what could well be a nice eliquid flavour and their kid gets the box with the pokemon on. What's wrong with that?

Seriously guys can you not see the irony here?
If we as vapers want freedom, we shouldn't condemn those who actually use it, or shackle ourselves out of fear of being shackled. Saying "oh no the TPD will ban this" isn't an excuse to try to ban it ourselves before they do, that's just cutting off our nose to spite our face and isn't making the situation any better. If we do this, we're no better than the TPD in my opinion.

No one's forcing you to buy this liquid. Don't force others not to. If you want freedom, give it to others as well.

This post is not meant to be offensive to anyone, I mean it respectfully and I'm only sharing my opinion - you are all fully entitled to your own opinions. We're all adults here, we're all vapers, let's keep it friendly.

 

[WaitFor1t88]

I have to say guys, I can see your points but would like to respectfully disagree for the following reasons:
Many adults enjoy pokemon, look at how many 18+ year olds play pokemon go - are adults not allowed to enjoy the same things as children? Why shouldn't they be marketed to? I'm 25 and I love adventure time. Yes I got the lemon grab reference, @pfvapes
Just because something could be interpreted negatively doesn't mean it is negative.
Sure, kids might see this and want it, but then it's down to the parents to do some actual parenting and prevent the kids from vaping underage. Maybe those parents who vape and have kids that like pokemon would enjoy these liquids, as they get what could well be a nice eliquid flavour and their kid gets the box with the pokemon on. What's wrong with that?

Seriously guys can you not see the irony here?
If we as vapers want freedom, we shouldn't condemn those who actually use it, or shackle ourselves out of fear of being shackled. Saying "oh no the TPD will ban this" isn't an excuse to try to ban it ourselves before they do, that's just cutting off our nose to spite our face and isn't making the situation any better. If we do this, we're no better than the TPD in my opinion.

No one's forcing you to buy this liquid. Don't force others not to. If you want freedom, give it to others as well.

This post is not meant to be offensive to anyone, I mean it respectfully and I'm only sharing my opinion - you are all fully entitled to your own opinions. We're all adults here, we're all vapers, let's keep it friendly.

Tell this to the vapers in the US who are fighting to keep vaping in some small form, from being banned altogether. these sorts of things could potentially have an effect
Theres so many things wrong with this juice, number 1, its blatently infringing copyright, thats not just a law with regards to vaping.

 

[SirLugg]

I have to say guys, I can see your points but would like to respectfully disagree for the following reasons:
Many adults enjoy pokemon, look at how many 18+ year olds play pokemon go - are adults not allowed to enjoy the same things as children? Why shouldn't they be marketed to? I'm 25 and I love adventure time. Yes I got the lemon grab reference, @pfvapes
Just because something could be interpreted negatively doesn't mean it is negative.
Sure, kids might see this and want it, but then it's down to the parents to do some actual parenting and prevent the kids from vaping underage. Maybe those parents who vape and have kids that like pokemon would enjoy these liquids, as they get what could well be a nice eliquid flavour and their kid gets the box with the pokemon on. What's wrong with that?

Seriously guys can you not see the irony here?
If we as vapers want freedom, we shouldn't condemn those who actually use it, or shackle ourselves out of fear of being shackled. Saying "oh no the TPD will ban this" isn't an excuse to try to ban it ourselves before they do, that's just cutting off our nose to spite our face and isn't making the situation any better. If we do this, we're no better than the TPD in my opinion.

No one's forcing you to buy this liquid. Don't force others not to. If you want freedom, give it to others as well.

This post is not meant to be offensive to anyone, I mean it respectfully and I'm only sharing my opinion - you are all fully entitled to your own opinions. We're all adults here, we're all vapers, let's keep it friendly.

Put in as short a fashion as possible, you're very wrong.
The reason being that our whole chosen lifestyle is under such close scrutiny at the moment that we as a community should not be giving them ammunition when we don't have to.

Whether 18+ year olds like Pokemon or not is irrelevant. The fact of the matter is it looks like it's directed towards a child. Again whether it is or not is of no importance- the powers that be will jump all over it as they would if it had Mickey Mouse on the front of it.

This isn't exercising any form of freedom- this is drawing outside fire into our community through blatant stupidity. So therefore as actions like this put pressure on us all, as a community we can exercise the freedom to shun it, ridicule it and not support it. Just because it's unnecessary.

 

[andre forest]

Put in as short a fashion as possible, you're very wrong.
The reason being that our whole chosen lifestyle is under such close scrutiny at the moment that we as a community should not be giving them ammunition when we don't have to.

Whether 18+ year olds like Pokemon or not is irrelevant. The fact of the matter is it looks like it's directed towards a child. Again whether it is or not is of no importance- the powers that be will jump all over it as they would if it had Mickey Mouse on the front of it.

This isn't exercising any form of freedom- this is drawing outside fire into our community through blatant stupidity. So therefore as actions like this put pressure on us all, as a community we can exercise the freedom to shun it, ridicule it and not support it. Just because it's unnecessary.

Remember the Charlie Hebdo cartoon of the prophet Muhammed? Did you think that was disrespectful, or did you post "je suis charlie" and stand for freedom of speech?

 

[andre forest]

Tell this to the vapers in the US who are fighting to keep vaping in some small form, from being banned altogether. these sorts of things could potentially have an effect
Theres so many things wrong with this juice, number 1, its blatently infringing copyright, thats not just a law with regards to vaping.

Yeah the copyright infringement is a very valid point - and if they used those images without permission, I do sincerely hope the creators of pokemon sue them. But I still think we shouldn't boycott them just because we're afraid the media will accuse us of marketing to children.

 

[SirLugg]

Remember the Charlie Hebdo cartoon of the prophet Muhammed? Did you think that was disrespectful, or did you post "je suis charlie" and stand for freedom of speech?

Where did that comparison come from? If you're going to compare a terrorist incident to badly marketed e liquid you're a very sick puppy.

 

[WaitFor1t88]

Remember the Charlie Hebdo cartoon of the prophet Muhammed? Did you think that was disrespectful, or did you post "je suis charlie" and stand for freedom of speech?

wtf, its like comparing apples to skyscrapers, how has the drawing of a fictional religious figure, got anything to do with liquid branding and copyright,