- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- Messages
- 27,534
*No wonder
Ooof
im docking a point off you there for gratuitous pedantry
*No wonder
When you're not writing derogatory posts about your parents, have gotten out of your bedroom for more than a few hours and had first hand experience of incidents like this and their effects then feel free to make a judgment.
Until such point keep that juvenile, nicotine deprived mind of yours and it's thoughts to yourself without trying to impress them upon other people through invalid comparisons and shows of false intelligence.
You're a grade A idiot. I really can't believe what's coming out of your head. Are you ill?
*No wonder
I already said the copyright infringement is wrong... All I'm saying is we shouldn't condemn them for marketing to a niche group that might be interpreted as marketing to children.
Also, stop making this personal. If you can't present a rational, logical retort without resorting to immature personal quips, then clearly you can't prove your own point. If you think you're right, then use reason to justify your views, not a personal attack on the person you're debating with. Come on, this isn't the U.S presidential election
For the fourth time now, can we please act like adults. There's no reason we can't have a simple discussion without being offensive and turning it into an argument.
I'm not stooping to your maturity or IQ level.
I'm not judging anyone, unlike you. I don't know you and you don't know me so how about we keep the personal comments out of this and for the fifth time act like adults. If you'd prefer to have a childish name calling argument, I'd suggest caution - I've read your posts about your mental condition @SirLugg. You're in one hell of a glass house so stop throwing stones.
Until this point I've chosen to be mature and rational, you haven't.
Either this continues as a mature, reasonable debate or it ends here. I'm not stooping to your maturity or IQ level.
Name a single company who isn't in business for the money*thanks for correcting my spelling, I would never have slept knowing that mistake was there.
What is this niche group they're marketing to "kidults"?
So if, as you say copyright infringement is wrong, then this product wouldn't be on the market, the makers wouldn't of made it.
Perhaps they should come up with their own ideas, instead of stealing.
This company is in it for one thing, money
*Buddha added to the pokedex*
Nathan Kitsell I don't want to talk to you. End of.