Trump says "Don't fear coronavirus".

["Misfit"]

 

[Mitz]

Unbelievable. 6 days and he's out of isolation. Normal Americans isolate for 2 weeks.

"Trump returns to the Oval Office six days after his COVID-19 diagnosis" https://twitter.com/i/events/1311831665379954688?s=09



Edit.
Sorry, didn't see same thing posted right above me. For some reason when I got here all I saw was a blue txt which I now know said... tweet loading. Lol

Going back to bed. Wake me up again when it's all over please.

 

[Mr Ripple]

Unbelievable. 6 days and he's out of isolation. Normal Americans isolate for 2 weeks.

"Trump returns to the Oval Office six days after his COVID-19 diagnosis" https://twitter.com/i/events/1311831665379954688?s=09

“Don Jr. has said he wants to stage an intervention, but Jared and Ivanka keep telling Trump how great he’s doing,” a source said. Don Jr. is said to be reluctant to confront his father alone. “Don said, ‘I’m not going to be the only one to tell him he’s acting crazy,’” the source added.

https://uproxx.com/viral/donald-trump-jr-thinks-president-is-acting-crazy/

 

[MHL]

WTF?!? The guy is just unbelievable.

Do you know, I could almost quite like him for his relentless tone deaf swagger, if he hadn't caused so much woe for the american ppl.

 

[BigCloud]

 

[Mitz]

“Don Jr. has said he wants to stage an intervention, but Jared and Ivanka keep telling Trump how great he’s doing,” a source said. Don Jr. is said to be reluctant to confront his father alone. “Don said, ‘I’m not going to be the only one to tell him he’s acting crazy,’” the source added.

https://uproxx.com/viral/donald-trump-jr-thinks-president-is-acting-crazy/

I've been optimistic that he's going to lose. Admittedly I've not long woke up after very little sleep but I'm getting a bad feeling. Either he's going to spin this into a win or @Jon The Vape is right and it's all just a big con. As I've said previously, I doubt it but if it happens it'll only happen in 'murca. Hopefully the feeling will evaporate when I fully wake up.

 

[Mr Ripple]

Call 555regeneron....

 

[Fuctifino]

Except the Flu IS MORE DEADLY THAN COVID-19

The BBC ran their "COVID-19 is 3 times more deadlier than flu" yesterday...

BUT - big but, here's the rub...
They originally used a chart to highlight this from ONS...

Guess what that chart showed - way way more deaths between 1992 to 2000
THERE WAS A MORE LETHAL FLU PANDEMIC FOR 8 YEARS !!!

DID WE LOCKDOWN ???
DID WE ALL WEAR MASKS ???
DID WE BUSINESSES CLOSE & FOLD ???

NOPE - OF COURSE NOT, NO HYSTERIA DURING 1992-2000
Now quickly realising this actually backfires on the hysteria,
the BBC very very quickly changed the chart to only focus on this year and this year 2020 ALONE,
without pointing out how we had MORE DEATHS in 1992-2000...
Now if you look at the story now you get the 2020 chart...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54463511

BUT originally they used the more historical chart:
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/amp/i...13a-9c3a-32ff42e783e6?published=1602155555107
(see the massive spike from 1992-2000 ???)

WHOOOOPPPSSSS - quick change it to 2020:
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/amp/i...778-8b5f-447923a8b931?published=1602157080104

I know what I saw yesterday at around 2:00pm
and it was the historical one with a MASSIVE spike in flu 1992/2020
(That destroys their argument COVID is more deadly - hence changed it)

Alas - I'm unable to find an archived version of it
no archive or cached page of the story's original format it seems
but screenshots of Google search shows the historical picture was used

What is more, there was also ANOTHER flu pandemic in the 70's...

But what this all shows, is that the Flu IS more deadlier than COVID-19
in 2000 onward they rolled out an increased vaccination programme
A programme, where a vaccine had been developed since the 30's

BUT WITHOUT A VACCINE, like in 1992-2000
for EIGHT YEARS there WAS MORE DEATHS than COVID-19

AND - these deaths were with a SMALLER POPULATION
The UK had a population of around 58m between 1992 to 2000 average
So that number of deaths in 1992~2000 would need to be increased by 15%
(in relation to UK having 67m or so today)
So say 60m deaths in 1999, in relation to today would be near 70m deaths

here are some pics...

 

[Mr Ripple]

Except the Flu IS MORE DEADLY THAN COVID-19

The BBC ran their "COVID-19 is 3 times more deadlier than flu" yesterday...

BUT - big but, here's the rub...
They originally used a chart to highlight this from ONS...

Guess what that chart showed - way way more deaths between 1992 to 2000
THERE WAS A MORE LETHAL FLU PANDEMIC FOR 8 YEARS !!!

DID WE LOCKDOWN ???
DID WE ALL WEAR MASKS ???
DID WE BUSINESSES CLOSE & FOLD ???

NOPE - OF COURSE NOT, NO HYSTERIA DURING 1992-2000
Now quickly realising this actually backfires on the hysteria,
the BBC very very quickly changed the chart to only focus on this year and this year 2020 ALONE,
without pointing out how we had MORE DEATHS in 1992-2000...
Now if you look at the story now you get the 2020 chart...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54463511

BUT originally they used the more historical chart:
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/amp/i...13a-9c3a-32ff42e783e6?published=1602155555107
(see the massive spike from 1992-2000 ???)

WHOOOOPPPSSSS - quick change it to 2020:
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/amp/i...778-8b5f-447923a8b931?published=1602157080104

I know what I saw yesterday at around 2:00pm
and it was the historical one with a MASSIVE spike in flu 1992/2020
(That destroys their argument COVID is more deadly - hence changed it)

Alas - I'm unable to find an archived version of it
no archive or cached page of the story's original format it seems
but screenshots of Google search shows the historical picture was used

What is more, there was also ANOTHER flu pandemic in the 70's...

But what this all shows, is that the Flu IS more deadlier than COVID-19
in 2000 onward they rolled out an increased vaccination programme
A programme, where a vaccine had been developed since the 30's

BUT WITHOUT A VACCINE, like in 1992-2000
for EIGHT YEARS there WAS MORE DEATHS than COVID-19

AND - these deaths were with a SMALLER POPULATION
The UK had a population of around 58m between 1992 to 2000 average
So that number of deaths in 1992~2000 would need to be increased by 15%
(in relation to UK having 67m or so today)
So say 60m deaths in 1999, in relation to today would be near 70m deaths

here are some pics...

TLDR it's not more deadly because it's being controlled.
Fuckedifinofickall fuck off with this shit youknowfuckall!

 

[Fuctifino]

Now for a bit of history from the ONS itself...

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...deathsoccurringbetween1januaryand31august2020

Now I don't know about you, I wasn't around in 1918
so could not say

BUT I certainly don't remember any lockdown measures & crap
during the seventies - say 1975 to 1984
nor
during the end of the century say late 1992 to 2000
where the deaths from influenza (and pneumonia) killed more people
(on a smaller population so increase by 15% maybe 20% for the seventies)

So with no widespread vaccine back then, (like COVID-19 TODAY)
Influenza IS MORE DEADLY THAN COVID-19
(and why BBC took down a historical graph & use just a 2020 one)
From the ONS - interactive graph showing the deaths each year...

Before I get lynched - the purpose of all this is to make a more FAIR COMPARISON
In the past, there was no real vaccine programme so less people were being vaccinated for flu

Now on THAT basis, population not being vaccinated (and no COVID-19 vaccine atm)
There were real epidemics during 70's & 90's with a higher death toll than COVID today

Split hairs as much as you like about actual real figures, actual pure deaths or associated deaths
My point above all else...

Do you remember the lockdown's from the seventies or nineties when all this took place ???
Me neither